Just watched the Grandad Twat one. Love it.

ArkZer0 wrote:
Yup, this video got absolutely slated on DIF as well.

Jesse asked a simple question. I want to see a reptilian, how do I see one?

He knows Icke's full of bullshit so he called hum on it and Icke had a shit fit. Simple as.

Blue_Tackler wrote: It's interesting that you found and mentioned this because this would have been the first point I raised with Currie (which she would have known nothing about). This was mentioned in a post I made on the DIF which was posted as a headline on the Max Keiser website:

www.maxkeiser.com/2011/04/wow-great-work-getting-these-links/

The S & L stuff is widely publicised and shows the difference between the way fraud is being treated today and the way it was in the past. Absolutely incredible fraud has occurred over the last few years, yet major figures haven't even faced criminal charges yet alone gone to prison. But yet there is obviously a precedent for this having occurred in the past.

So Currie is right to sit there and say "people from Wall Street have gone to jail", but to just let her sit there and say this out of context and imply that the crimes that have taken place recently have been appropriately dealt with because you don't know any different is just rubbish. If I'd have interviewed her, I would have run rings round her, and Max Keiser would have nailed her to a post.

Hello, first time poster and only found this board about a week ago after noticing the mass suspensions, bannings post deletions and editing going on over a DIF which when I first saw it in relation to TPV really blew me away that such underhand behaviour was going on, on a site purportedly under the auspices of a 'truth' seeker......Icke (blimey had an attack of the long words there)

What has just occurred to me, although not sure if it's been covered in this thread as I haven't gone all the way through it, is that we were told that Icke and Sean had the idea to do a broadcast platform only in May last year. So I guess at that early stage they would have discussed ways of funding and came up with the original idea of crowd funding - so far so good.

If this was something I was going to do and decided that I needed £100k to do it, I would not have run out to my friendly local accountants to start a company (TPV broadcasting Ltd or somesuch) as soon as I had the idea cos how the hell would I know if I would have got the £100K which as it happens turned into £300K

Perhaps the answers is as simple as the fact that every crowd funding campaign needs to have the business set up with specific bank accounts (Barclays...!!) for it to go ahead, but couldn't it have gone just as well into an existing business account and then have the new limited company set up when the target was reached as I'm sure the original campaign had to reach it's target before getting a cent (why does he always say cent, when we have always had pennies in the UK)

Like I say to me it was very presumptuous that they knew they would raise the money for it otherwise why start new companies way before
the initial campaign started...........

Apologies if this has already been questioned

Arthur wrote:
Welcome to the boards

You make a good point Arthur, I don't know whether it was presumed long before hand or whether as soon as they realised they were gonna hit 100k it got done. Interesting.

I do believe I know why Icke says cent instead of pence though.

He does the same thing with not-for-profit vs nonprofit. The tax man makes a crucial legal distinction between not for profit and non profit. Not for profit is in relation to an activity and non profit is in relation to an organisation. Its a loophole he keeps using to pull the wool over people's eyes and stay within the law, ir not libel.

I believe the same is the case for cents vs pennies. Icke trades in GBP, not USD. Therefor, he cannot be lying when he says he hasn't taken a cent.

Morning and thank you for yesterday, when, like so many others I flew in here for refuge.

How dreadful that people are being treated the way they are of DIF,

Part of the message is hidden for the guests. Please log in or register to see it.

I always wondered what Shaun did all day now I know!

Ha ha ! Grandad Twat ! excellent

oooh just heard

internet, wifi, and everything down at the studio !!!

Must be the Angels of Anarchy......or maybe they just annoyed the wrong people too often

SilvaRizla wrote:
Cheers for welcome SR

Very cynical way of looking at the 'I haven't taken a cent' line............., but I was thinking that anyway

I've seen the legal Ltd Co. documents for the TPV broadcast set up I think it was on earthlinggb blog on one of the many TPV posts he has done, and it was set up 17 or 18 May......, with 2 directors Sean and Icke who has now resigned as director.

So did they have the psychic foresight to know they would get the initial funding..........

Mother Damnable wrote:
Must be that pesky infiltraitor

A new drama unfolds there daily.

It's not long since I argued the DIF TPV supporters shouldn't be labelled gullible, fuckwits, but regrettably, I'm revising my opinion because some seem to be exactly that.

For eg. when members' reaction to the link Gren posted there yesterday, was to whinge that it shouldn't be there because it's damaging to their cause, as opposed to making any effort to evaluate that information - well it demonstrates an impressive level of deliberate ignorance.

Arthur wrote:
It is a cynical view yes, but I believe its warranted, He's bloody dodgy is Icke.

For instance, when Icke stepped down as a director, he claimed that it was because they couldn't get a license because of his political past or some such nonsense. This is strictly not true. Here are the licensing guidelines, Icke falls under non of them.

licensing.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/tv/tlcs_guidance.pdf

The station itself cannot have a political objective, nothing to do with Icke.

Icke stepped down in order to leave Sean handling the hot potato should they receive a big fine or something fuck up. This thread has revealed much about Ickes character, way with words, and outright lies.

Like I say, I don't know what the score is re the set up date but it is interesting. The Indigogo campaign didn't start until 31st May.

looks like they are saying on the toxic mole thread that the Police/authorities are involved??? This should be good

It's simple really...they already had the £100,000 to enable them to set up the various bits and pieces. Not necessarily in hard cash, but in assets. The requirement by the bank would have been to match that with hard cash.

SilvaRizla wrote:
I couldn't really make head or tail of why he had to resign either - I thought his political past was as member (leader?) of the Green Party and receiver of the fewest votes ever when he stood for parliament (or was it a council seat/)

diforumreject wrote:
I think its confusion mate.

They did say authorities were involved but that was over the supposed "hacking" of TPV.

Arthur wrote:
He was a member of the green party, I don't know the exact extent but it was only low level stuff. That's not the important bit though, the important bit is catching his bullshit and pointing it out.

People are going without for this con man. Its not on.

diforumreject wrote:
sueperb
Senior Member
I'm sure someone from TPV said on Facebook or Twitter that the authorities had been informed, if so then why has no
statement from TPV been issued, " an employee/volunteer was today interviewed by Police on suspicion of...."
instead of all these cryptic messages ?
__________________
i_am
Technical Advisor
Maybe legal reasons?


www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=266467&page=3

I'm reading that as speculation (it's re the toxic mole *stifles giggle*)- Superb's wondering why there wasn't proper info in Icke's announcement, such as for eg. the police investigation thng.

I_Am_Silly is just trying to think up an acceptable explanation to cover for Icke's typical BS.

The thing is, IF he couldn't say anything for legal reasons, because of a legal investigation being underway, then how come he can accurately predict what and when the outcome will be?

He can't. It's as simple as that.

It's all jiggery-pokery, and they needed the 2 weeks to cook up a case against some poor unsuspecting party there.

l always wondered why there seems to be 100's of people online at DIF and hardly anyone commenting - it's everyone who's been banned just sitting back watching the nonsense unfold over there - oh and looking for who's going to be banned next by asking questions.....

@mother damnable

in your blog post you say
by 'star' do you mean like edwina curry and other 'public figures' who appear on tpv or something else entirely?

hope you dont mind me asking

SilvaRizla wrote:
Have to say my better half got his number a long time ago, she said he was no better than a god bothering tv evangelist fleecing his followers of what he can get from them