Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
10 Jul 2012 17:18 #125
Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
Maybe so that people would ask that very question and dismiss the idea that the Rothschilds had anything to do with funding Hitler, I dont know, but actions speak louder than words. For anyone reading who wants to know the other side of the coin, this documentary seems to cover Wall Streets involvment in Hitlers rise to power:
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
10 Jul 2012 17:27 #126
Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
Maybe so that people would ask that very question and dismiss the idea that the Rothschilds had anything to do with funding Hitler, I dont know, but actions speak louder than words. For anyone reading who wants to know the other side of the coin, this documentary seems to cover Wall Streets involvment in Hitlers rise to power:
Where does Antony Sutton talk about the Rothchilds?
Everyone knows Henry Ford was a big fan of Hitler. And Sutton seems amazed big business would deal with the Nazis. Which is bizarre consifering if you look around the world today it's abundantly clear big corporations couldn't care less who they're dealing with as long as it's profitable. It's not like Nazi Germany operated in an economic vacuum.
it's like Edwin Black getting all excited because of IBM's dealings with the Nazis - what did he expect? Oh dearie me no! You people are not very nice so you can take your money elsewhere!
And you're suggesting the Rothchilds deliberately had the Nazis causing them a major headache and trying to nick their stuff so it wouldn't look suspicious or whatever/ How does that work?
Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
Maybe so that people would ask that very question and dismiss the idea that the Rothschilds had anything to do with funding Hitler, I dont know, but actions speak louder than words. For anyone reading who wants to know the other side of the coin, this documentary seems to cover Wall Streets involvment in Hitlers rise to power:
Where does Antony Sutton talk about the Rothchilds?
Everyone knows Henry Ford was a big fan of Hitler. And Sutton seems amazed big business would deal with the Nazis. Which is bizarre consifering if you look around the world today it's abundantly clear big corporations couldn't care less who they're dealing with as long as it's profitable. It's not like Nazi Germany operated in an economic vacuum.
it's like Edwin Black getting all excited because of IBM's dealings with the Nazis - what did he expect? Oh dearie me no! You people are not very nice so you can take your money elsewhere!
And you're suggesting the Rothchilds deliberately had the Nazis causing them a major headache and trying to nick their stuff so it wouldn't look suspicious or whatever/ How does that work?
From 6:50 in part 2 he talks about a series of loans including one from Standard oil, and when you read Rockerfeller/Rockenfelder, you are actually reading Rothschild. Im never going to be able to show you a cheque from mr R'child to Mr Hitler - clearly the warmongers have more clever ways of funnelling money to the people they are choosing to support. If you dont believe in a global conspiracy then we will be talking a different language here, but the point is that the war never would have happened without Wall Street, or elite owned American companies with subsidiaries in germany.
As for the R'child assets, I dont know - maybe hilter realised he'd been used, or maybe it was just another smoke screen. It happens all the time,, so when anyone gets close to the truth, someone says hang on, what about xyz - why would the elite shoot themselves in the foot etc etc and the conspiracy goes down in flames.
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
10 Jul 2012 18:18 #129
Money is a source of power , yet all bankers are not jewish and banking was not born from jews, it really wasn't
The Rothschilds are mentioned time and time again as being the bad guys, but if they really were the REAL bad guys do you think that as a ordinary people we would have heard of them
Thinking about it a couple of anarcho mates, who also happened to be married (one's deceased), well the wife's mother was Jewish so she in some way related herself to Jews whilst ideologically dismissing Judaism along with all other faiths. Having said that she was always in charge of the remote control so maybe Grem has a point!
Money is a source of power , yet all bankers are not jewish and banking was not born from jews, it really wasn't
The Rothschilds are mentioned time and time again as being the bad guys, but if they really were the REAL bad guys do you think that as a ordinary people would have heard of them
Their power was once well known, but their plan was in danger of being exposed so they went underground into media, medicine, military, money and they manipulate via multinationals under names other than Rothschilds. Basically they got brilliant at disguising their power and influence, but they are up to their same old tricks. A good example of how the powerful people of the world slip under the radar and avoid criticism is how we replaced physical occupation of the 3rd world with financial occupation - It just looks better, but its the same shit, just a different veneer.
Yes people have heard of the rothschilds, but try telling the average Joe that they have a desire to own this planet and they will laugh. I mean, people think Bill gates is the richest person dont they? Yet the rothschilds count their fortunes in multiples of trillions and many govts including UK and USA have been bankrupt to the Rothschilds since the 30's. Most people just have some vague idea that R'childs are bankers, and no concept of their true power.
Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
Maybe so that people would ask that very question and dismiss the idea that the Rothschilds had anything to do with funding Hitler, I dont know, but actions speak louder than words. For anyone reading who wants to know the other side of the coin, this documentary seems to cover Wall Streets involvment in Hitlers rise to power:
Where does Antony Sutton talk about the Rothchilds?
Everyone knows Henry Ford was a big fan of Hitler. And Sutton seems amazed big business would deal with the Nazis. Which is bizarre consifering if you look around the world today it's abundantly clear big corporations couldn't care less who they're dealing with as long as it's profitable. It's not like Nazi Germany operated in an economic vacuum.
it's like Edwin Black getting all excited because of IBM's dealings with the Nazis - what did he expect? Oh dearie me no! You people are not very nice so you can take your money elsewhere!
And you're suggesting the Rothchilds deliberately had the Nazis causing them a major headache and trying to nick their stuff so it wouldn't look suspicious or whatever/ How does that work?
From 6:50 in part 2 he talks about a series of loans including one from Standard oil, and when you read Rockerfeller/Rockenfelder, you are actually reading Rothschild. Im never going to be able to show you a cheque from mr R'child to Mr Hitler - clearly the warmongers have more clever ways of funnelling money to the people they are choosing to support. If you dont believe in a global conspiracy then we will be talking a different language here, but the point is that the war never would have happened without Wall Street, or elite owned American companies with subsidiaries in germany.
As for the R'child assets, I dont know - maybe hilter realised he'd been used, or maybe it was just another smoke screen. It happens all the time,, so when anyone gets close to the truth, someone says hang on, what about xyz - why would the elite shoot themselves in the foot etc etc and the conspiracy goes down in flames.
I was under the impression that although they both begin with R, Rothchild is not Rockerfeller.
Saying 'they have more clever ways of funnelling money' is another way of saying 'i'm assuming this happens to fit my existing belief system'. You also do this by deciding that counter-evidence must be deliberately designed to put people off the scent. So whatever happens, it confirms your belief system because anything that doesn't fit the conspirators deliberately engineered not to fit.
But no - I don't believe in the global conspiracy. I believe in far more frightening reality where nobody is at the wheel and the impression that the people at the top like to give that they know what they're doing is an illusion.
Rothschilds.
where did Germany get money for a war machine if not from 'international bankers'? .
Probably the single best analysis of the Nazis from an economic perspective you'll find. Except it's a proper tome, full of economic jargon and none of it is about a big conspiracy on the part of 'international bankers' www.amazon.co.uk/The-Wages-Destruction-B...1933436&sr=8-1-spell
If the Rothchilds had anything to do with the Nazis, why do you suppose the Nazis went after their assets in the 1930s?
Maybe so that people would ask that very question and dismiss the idea that the Rothschilds had anything to do with funding Hitler, I dont know, but actions speak louder than words. For anyone reading who wants to know the other side of the coin, this documentary seems to cover Wall Streets involvment in Hitlers rise to power:
Where does Antony Sutton talk about the Rothchilds?
Everyone knows Henry Ford was a big fan of Hitler. And Sutton seems amazed big business would deal with the Nazis. Which is bizarre consifering if you look around the world today it's abundantly clear big corporations couldn't care less who they're dealing with as long as it's profitable. It's not like Nazi Germany operated in an economic vacuum.
it's like Edwin Black getting all excited because of IBM's dealings with the Nazis - what did he expect? Oh dearie me no! You people are not very nice so you can take your money elsewhere!
And you're suggesting the Rothchilds deliberately had the Nazis causing them a major headache and trying to nick their stuff so it wouldn't look suspicious or whatever/ How does that work?
From 6:50 in part 2 he talks about a series of loans including one from Standard oil, and when you read Rockerfeller/Rockenfelder, you are actually reading Rothschild. Im never going to be able to show you a cheque from mr R'child to Mr Hitler - clearly the warmongers have more clever ways of funnelling money to the people they are choosing to support. If you dont believe in a global conspiracy then we will be talking a different language here, but the point is that the war never would have happened without Wall Street, or elite owned American companies with subsidiaries in germany.
As for the R'child assets, I dont know - maybe hilter realised he'd been used, or maybe it was just another smoke screen. It happens all the time,, so when anyone gets close to the truth, someone says hang on, what about xyz - why would the elite shoot themselves in the foot etc etc and the conspiracy goes down in flames.
I was under the impression that although they both begin with R, Rothchild is not Rockerfeller.
Saying 'they have more clever ways of funnelling money' is another way of saying 'i'm assuming this happens to fit my existing belief system'. You also do this by deciding that counter-evidence must be deliberately designed to put people off the scent. So whatever happens, it confirms your belief system because anything that doesn't fit the conspirators deliberately engineered not to fit.
But no - I don't believe in the global conspiracy. I believe in far more frightening reality where nobody is at the wheel and the impression that the people at the top like to give that they know what they're doing is an illusion.
They interbreed, and have done since the start, some say the R'fellers are a rothschild bloodline, either way, the R'childs pwn the R'fellers. This vid shows how 'close' they are
I hear what you are saying, and to be honest I should be presenting a much stronger case for my beliefs, but that requires thought and effort on my part :o I was hoping i could just make a few assertions and post a couple youtube clips. But its a very interesting subject really and does deserve a thread all of its own as there is so much good info available on this topic.
I personally cant see how there isnt a global conspiracy, but hopefully we will all live long enough to find out
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
10 Jul 2012 19:37 #134
yeah dothamy but you aso have to look to the Royal family and the vatican to see where all the money actually is .
Personally I used to think it was all down to the Jesuits or the Masons and not the jews...however saying blaming it on the Rotschilds is a bit blinkered in my opinion. Greedy fuckers yeah , but trying to control the world ..no
[
They interbreed, and have done since the start, some say the R'fellers are a rothschild bloodline, either way, the R'childs pwn the R'fellers. This vid shows how 'close' they are
that doesn't mean everything the Rockerfellers did over half a century ago was somehow under the direct control of the Rothchilds.
I've never got all this 'bloodlines' stuff - rich people are statistically more likely to breed with other rich people. Not exclusively of course, but people have a general tendency to pair off with people from a comparable social class because that's who they meet, hang out with and can relate to. It would be more surprising if a Rothchild married someone on the dole living in a housing association flat in Salford than a Rockerfeller.
Of course in the past marriage was used to forge and cement political alliances, but that was an overt policy of royalty.
I hear what you are saying, and to be honest I should be presenting a much stronger case for my beliefs, but that requires thought and effort on my part :o I was hoping i could just make a few assertions and post a couple youtube clips. But its a very interesting subject really and does deserve a thread all of its own as there is so much good info available on this topic.
I personally cant see how there isnt a global conspiracy, but hopefully we will all live long enough to find out
Yeah it's interesting. I can't get my head round thinking there is a global conspiracy. As opposed to a bunch of different wealthy people whose interests intersect and diverge according to what's happening at the time.
If there is, they must be privy to some immense secret - look at any typical office - there'll be people who don't get on with each other, different cliques, people getting on and then falling out. Hell, since we've been discussing the Nazis, if you read about them in depth there were loads of interpersonal conflicts going on in the hierarchy. How normal humans (though there's the lizards I guess if you believe in that stuff) could ever pull together a global conspiracy is beyond me.
And what for? The super rich already control the planet through the existing system - what's there to conspire about?
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
10 Jul 2012 20:01 #136
Thinking about it a couple of anarcho mates, who also happened to be married (one's deceased), well the wife's mother was Jewish so she in some way related herself to Jews whilst ideologically dismissing Judaism along with all other faiths. Having said that she was always in charge of the remote control so maybe Grem has a point!
haha, one of my best mates is an Israeli Jew. He totally dismisses Judaism, but he says he is 100% Jew (as that refers to his genetics, rather than religion, apparently) and when he comes over for christmas dinner he eats more bacon than anyone else. But he is a banker, and earns over £100K plus bonuses He used to work in a bank that had a giant hexagram on the floor of the lobby too
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
11 Jul 2012 08:01 #138
yeah dothamy but you aso have to look to the Royal family and the vatican to see where all the money actually is .
Personally I used to think it was all down to the Jesuits or the Masons and not the jews...however saying blaming it on the Rotschilds is a bit blinkered in my opinion. Greedy fuckers yeah , but trying to control the world ..no
Yes, Queen is worth some 17 trillion, though some reckon its as high as 30 trillion, but much of that is tied in mineral rights I think. r'childs have the cash flow, and ar worth far more. But yes, the are not 'in it' alone, they just happen to be top dogs.
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
11 Jul 2012 08:03 #139
[
They interbreed, and have done since the start, some say the R'fellers are a rothschild bloodline, either way, the R'childs pwn the R'fellers. This vid shows how 'close' they are
that doesn't mean everything the Rockerfellers did over half a century ago was somehow under the direct control of the Rothchilds.
I've never got all this 'bloodlines' stuff - rich people are statistically more likely to breed with other rich people. Not exclusively of course, but people have a general tendency to pair off with people from a comparable social class because that's who they meet, hang out with and can relate to. It would be more surprising if a Rothchild married someone on the dole living in a housing association flat in Salford than a Rockerfeller.
Of course in the past marriage was used to forge and cement political alliances, but that was an overt policy of royalty.
I hear what you are saying, and to be honest I should be presenting a much stronger case for my beliefs, but that requires thought and effort on my part :o I was hoping i could just make a few assertions and post a couple youtube clips. But its a very interesting subject really and does deserve a thread all of its own as there is so much good info available on this topic.
I personally cant see how there isnt a global conspiracy, but hopefully we will all live long enough to find out
Yeah it's interesting. I can't get my head round thinking there is a global conspiracy. As opposed to a bunch of different wealthy people whose interests intersect and diverge according to what's happening at the time.
If there is, they must be privy to some immense secret - look at any typical office - there'll be people who don't get on with each other, different cliques, people getting on and then falling out. Hell, since we've been discussing the Nazis, if you read about them in depth there were loads of interpersonal conflicts going on in the hierarchy. How normal humans (though there's the lizards I guess if you believe in that stuff) could ever pull together a global conspiracy is beyond me.
And what for? The super rich already control the planet through the existing system - what's there to conspire about?
The super-rich can never have enough power, even if they outright owned the planet and its population - I ran out of time again so will come back to this later
You must register to post here.
Re: jews do control the media
11 Jul 2012 08:29 #140
Yes, Queen is worth some 17 trillion, though some reckon its as high as 30 trillion, but much of that is tied in mineral rights I think. r'childs have the cash flow, and ar worth far more. But yes, the are not 'in it' alone, they just happen to be top dogs.
What a Crown agent is in context.
https://american_almanac.tripod.com/agents.htm
The Rothschilds aren't any more jewish than my dog.
The Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. 2, p. 497) admits that:
"It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time (1905) the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure."
If this latter statement is true the Rothschilds control in addition to their own fortune the immense liquid resource of the Catholic Church, which is second only to the Rothschilds' in wealth and power.
boots: I do not agree with this statement for what I know of the Vatican they NEVER give away their power...never.
The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....
With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...
In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...
Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021,
in USD.
No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.
Today640 Yesterday8190 Week21326 Month46261 Total1144685 Your IP Address: 216.73.216.111Your Browser and OS: Unknown - UnknownFriday, 28 August 2026 01:43
Who Is Online
Guests : 1035 guests onlineMembers : No members online
