I agree with you entirely wub - good to see you again btw

My belief is that the upper echelons whether they be jewish, christian, atheist, muslim, moonie, male, female, gay, straight, or whatever it is people wish to define them as have one thing in common and that is the desire to perpetuate their power, wealth and position. Organised religion, law, and all other tools of division subjugation and supplication are just those - tools used to allow those at the top to remain there - the same thing goes on every rung of the ladder to a greater or lesser extent. In some ways it is a survival of the fittest type scenario only what constitutes the fittest is the person who will do or say whatever it takes. Every walk of life and group has this sort of person in it - its just that as you go higher up, the playing board gets bigger and the impact hits wider.

Dear Modbastards.

Could you please do your mod magic and make it so that whenever thoreau posts on the SZ a thankyou from dub automatically appears. It would save my bony arthritic fingers from much suffering. Thank you.

Paul

thoreau wrote: Nice to be back. I moved flats recently and it was quite difficult to get a phoneline as the teetering infrastructure of Britain had been destroyed by some rain.

Totally agree with everything you've saying here. Another way of expressing it rather than 'survival of the fittest' is that people who ascend to high positions are disproportionately likely to be socio / psycopathic.

dubmeup wrote:
haha I have come crazily close to some feminist rants of late - so you may wish you hadnt said that soon

@ wub hope the move wasnt too stressful

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Exactly. Anyone is capable of this if they have the right upbringing.
It is the environment which makes a man (or woman lets not be sexist lol) what he is.

Most people never see this as they rarely get to see much beyond their own culture anyway.

Nice to see you back btw wub, all settled now?

thoreau wrote:
Bing!!! The dart hit the bullseye so hard it went through the board

thoreau wrote:
Don't count on it woman... man hasn't a bad word to say about you. Between you and me, I think the poor soul has a crush on you - which means ab's will be devastated and I ain't being the one to tell him

You could though...

get stuffed

According to Icke, a lot of the bad Jews (such as hitlers generals etc) are/were actually Sabbatean Frankists who seek to destroy religions from the inside. They loathe Judaism as it stands for traditional morality and other good stuff, so stands in the way of the NWO, general evilness or whatever. So I know a lot of Joos arent really Joos, and Im pretty sure the Rothschilds simply hide behind being Jewish so if anyone tries to expose their crimes they can shout anti-semite. But for whatever reason, Jews do control hollywood and the media, and they boast about it enough. they also control wall street. I noticed too that the most highly paid and famous (and most money oriented and least genuine) health 'gurus' all are jewish (david wolfe, gabriel cousens, matt monarch, dr mercola, etc). I dont think these are the type of Jews who are religious in anyway, but nevertheless, they call themselves jews.

dubmeup wrote:
Stop shoving em up your bum then you dirty bugger

You get stuffed anorl

psketti wrote:
Dubbywubby and I have an 'understanding'. So mind your own. Stirrer.

As you were.

See how she works, dubs? Divide and conquer and all that.

*patiently awaits grem returning to disregard everything put before him with a witty retort such as "and then what for Marxist/Jewish run media (but not the Daily Mail)?'"*

oioioi wrote:
It would be easier if you just got a real pet ya know

psketti wrote:
Is that an offer?

oioioi wrote:
You bad mouthing the daily mail

Bloody liberals, sorry anarchist's....................................yeah liberals.

gremlin wrote:
How come your not filling up the race and immigration section over at the dif with stuff about the evil Somalians and non white non Brits?

domathy wrote:
That is complete and utter bollocks.

'Jews' in the Wehrmacht were Mischling - those classified as part Jewish under the Nuremburg Laws. They were part 'racially' Jewish and seen slightly differently by Nazi law, plus the Nazis were slightly more sympathetic to people in the military. Some of these guys didn't even know they were part 'racially' Jewish until their ancestry was checked. They were subject to restrictions within the hierarchy and IIRC their position got a bit more tricky over time. However a lot of Germans of Jewish lineage saw themselves as German first and foremost - these guys tended not to regard themselves as Jewish in any way.
The Nazis had quite a game trying to sort out who was 'Jewish' - when you start trying to classify people in a 'racial' way it gets pretty difficult when people have been intermarrying for years. And of course the 'Jewish race' bit was mixed up with good 'Aryan blood'. But you have to remember a practicsing protestant could be 'a jew' to the Nazis becaues they were thinking on 'racial' grounds. One Jewish grandparent and you were 'racially' part Jewish.

Where the hell 'Sabbatean Frankists' comes from I have no idea - where does Icke get that crazy idea from ?!?

dantesrevival wrote:

gremlin wrote:
lmao!