feather wrote:
That is obviously not true as you made the arrogant preconception that the members here, (and presumably at 4chan), were unable to determine answers for themselves and you possessed superior knowledge which you were prepared to graciously impart to them.
Nobody said you were unable to determine the answers. Dont put yourself down so much, I dont think anyone here is stupid.
feather wrote:
(1) Did it ever occur to you that those who participate in conspiracy discussions have had their fill of all-knowing gurus?
You think I am an all-knowing guru?
feather wrote:
(2) No human, whether concealed behind an anonymous descriptor or avatar is without an ego. The word literally means 'I' or 'self'.
The occasion when you are having a discussion with an egoless entity on the web is the one where your talking with a bot.
My answers that are from the matrix of consciousness are from a place where the ego has no effect. My answers that arent from there surely have some ulterior motive somewhere down the line.
feather wrote:
Just about everyone I know but I can't believe I even bothered to respond to that to be honest.
Really? Where are you from?
feather wrote:
I indicated it was "your turn" to make the tea. Rather than being symbolic of subjugation, it should have indicated that you were an equal and someone else would be making you tea when it was their turn.
Answer honestly, what would you describe your emotional state as when you asked that of me?
feather wrote:
(a)"All questions will be answered." Not a lot of room for limits or humility in that statement eh?
i am not understanding why you think I am being like that. By answering questions I am putting forward a service. I arent asking for your money or adoration and I genuinely believe the information I give can be helpful especially to those who are questing spiritually.
feather wrote:
Why on earth would my 'self' be threatened? Please expand upon the dangers to me?
Do you mean my self-confidence perhaps because you may expose a lack of information or perception on my part?
My entire life has been spent in such exchanges with people from tiny children through to professors and all stops in between. I mostly enjoyed the experiences. The less enjoyable ones were the revelations of just how barbaric and disturbed people can be.
(c) Again you take the self-centric viewpoint. We all enter into knowledge and perception discussions to refine our understanding. Otherwise why would we bother? The difference is that everyone else would view it as a two-way exchange not a pontificating platform.
It is just more efficient in the format I came with IF the person asking the questions does just that. Like I said you could get way further by just asking sincere questions.
It is like when a novice wants to learn from someone who masters a craft. The more resistance the novice puts in, the longer it takes for them to glean information. Has a teacher never chided you for being silly or acting up in class, have you never seen a professor have favourites? All that is for a good reason.
For the record, I am terrified everytime I ask a question of the matrix of consciousness. The answer is hardly ever the one you want to hear.
feather wrote:
(d) Nice little bag of attempted derisory assumptions there. I asked you a question earlier regarding the whereabouts of Peter Piper's peck of pickled peppers. You replied with the co-ordinates for Edinburgh, rather than truthfully respond that the subject was merely a device in a tongue-twister and did not actually exist. So either you are not a trustworthy source of accurate information and therefore I should spend no more time indulging you or you were being jokey and flippant which apparently, according to your own standards, is not de rigueur for a conspiracy forum.
The co-ordinates to a place where a man named Peter picks pecks of pickled peppers actually. How do you find that to be wrong in any way?
Of all the questions to ask you choose that one. Not because you wished to push and expand you own consciousness.......but because you wanted to test me. Hence your ego took over. If you took that question to your higher self it would not be impressed, the implications of which are not good at all.
feather wrote:
Here's your tea btw.
You don't have to make tea just because this place is full of mugs.