oioioi wrote:

I actually found that amusing to my neanderthal brain

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Nah that aint it. We regularly disagree here as you know. We've had some right hum dinger fall outs. Many of us have stretched if not broken the guidelines in so doing. One person's positive is another's negative.

I'd like a forum free of wannabe trouble maker twats, they just waste folks' energy.

knobmeup wrote: But you post like a wannabe trouble maker

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
There is conflict, which you are used too, and so live your life that way. No offence intened BTW. Others are poets , lovers and bull-shitters. We came here to get away from the petty niggling and snidey-shite, which you seem to love .

feather wrote:
But I said who I was and why I arrived on my opening post on this forum, so I'm not being evasive at all.
it's just that I'm being harassed for being a 'sock' because that's how some of these posters minds seem work.

Surely that's their issue not mine, I've already posted my arrival and my reason for it.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
I think you're flouting this one:
1.0.1 Registration
(ii) Only one member account is allowed per person. If more than one member of your household wishes to join you're required to notify us. If you fail to inform us that more than one person actively takes part on our system your account/s maybe removed with out notice. We actively monitor users connections to our system to prevent multi account violation.

I also think turns of phrase you employ go against the community guidelines, with particular reference to:
3. We will not tolerate racism, sexism, homophobia or other forms of hate-speech, or content that could be interpreted as such.

I hold up your frequent use of the word 'retard' for consideration by the community. You clearly use the term in this sense:
re·tard 2 (rtärd)
n. Offensive Slang
1. Used as a disparaging term for a mentally retarded person.

Which I interpret as being contravening the spirit of the above guideline, for obvious reasons.

Even KOTG refused to call anybody a retard... !

feather wrote:
I couldn't give a flying fuck who has what or how many accounts don't care you are obcessed lot ain't you, i might still have an account or three here who cares

Is it any fucking wonder peebs have left and gone back to Diftardia another joke where is everyone gone explain that , you can't the irony ooooh the drama and as for being busted for having a sock account FUCKING BULLSHIT

I Told Sketti who I was in the chatroom get fucking facts straight first eh before you type any shite gett it yet has it sunk in no, its cause your what!!!!!!!!

Well thankfully you're outnumbered by people who do give a flying fuck. Most don't give a flying fuck about any socks who've been got rid of - and of good posters who've left, I doubt they did so because of socks being booted out?

You sound like a cocky kid going, "Look at me, I'm a rebel". Grow up.

knobmeup wrote: re·tard·ed, re·tard·ing, re·tards

To cause to move or proceed slowly; delay or impede.

verb (used with object)
1.
to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.

verb (used without object)
2.
to be delayed.

You were being a retard in hindering and slowing the progress of the biocentrism thread, with unrelated comments. ''tiz sock'......''smalls drawer''
Conclusion no offence provided as the cap fits. If you have chosen to take that comment in a subjective disparaging manner that's your issue not mine.

About your first point ''(ii) Only one member account is allowed per person. ''

That's pure speculation on your behalf, I provided information about who I was and why I came to this forum on my opening post.

So if you have any evidence that I have broken a forum rule, please stop posing illusionary arguments and get to the actual fact.

EDIT
definitely speculation, so you're retarding my progress as a poster on this forum with speculative allegations.
How sad and unhelpful.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
Wow. That really seems a big deal to you since you keep repeating it. I suppose I should be flattered in a way.

I even feel a bit guilty about posting the link of the thread to which you continuously refer.

sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/General/93198-ru...axman.html?start=160

I invite all posters, presuming they can be bothered, to read the thread and decide for themselves if your version of our conversation happened as you say. I should also point out that one should pay attention to the times of the edits and posts. Specifically, I quoted you flouncing and declaring that you no longer wished to use this forum. You subsequently edited this out.

I believe, if you truly felt that you had "outsparred me" you would not have felt the need to do so.

mikey mikey wrote:
Well to be honest as always Mikey Mikey dear boy, I'm bored of our conflict, you may see it one way and I another, the only reason that I refer to it as it seems to have been the trigger that sparked the idea that I was a 'sock' poster.
So this socking attachment that I had thrown at me is in relation to our conversation on the Brand thread.
So the sock alleging crew have interpreted my conversation/debate with you that I have some type of prior SZ experience.
Why would they think that if I did not kick your ass?

To Mikey Mikey
here is your quote of me declaring that I no longer wish to use the forum

mikey mikey wrote:
You see Mikey it says 'That's not why I'm using the forum'.....not as you say that it says '' quoted you flouncing and declaring that you no longer wished to use this forum''

I can't edit your post can I ?

If that is how you choose to recall our conversation, then go right ahead. It seems to mean a lot to you. The thread won't change apart from you editing your posts even further to fit your narrative. Neither will people here suddenly start believing that they suspected you as a sock because of it rather than because of your evasiveness.

As for being "bored of our conflict", you seem rather persistent tbh.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
So why did you edit it out. Or have I missed it and it is still there?

it's not edited out it's the same info in my post a few posts before yours. I only edited In additional info nothing was removed.

mikey mikey wrote:
But I have not been evasive, I said who I was and how I came to use this forum on my opening post.

Uh huh. You edited your post after I had posted mine and turned a flounce out into something else. In the original context you were most certainly taking your ball and leaving. Unfortunately, there is no way to see the original.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
About previous SZ accounts?