knobmeup wrote:
Cousin_Frothy wrote:
If you think I have broken a forum rule or regulation please identify exactly which one and I will then take your enlightenment into account regarding the timing of any disclosures that would be required, if I have any to disclose.
I think you're flouting this one:
1.0.1 Registration
(ii)
Only one member account is allowed per person. If more than one member of your household wishes to join you're required to notify us. If you fail to inform us that more than one person actively takes part on our system your account/s maybe removed with out notice. We actively monitor users connections to our system to prevent multi account violation.
I also think turns of phrase you employ go against the community guidelines, with particular reference to:
3. We will not tolerate racism, sexism, homophobia or other forms of hate-speech, or content that could be interpreted as such.
I hold up your frequent use of the word 'retard' for consideration by the community. You clearly use the term in this sense:
re·tard 2 (rtärd)
n. Offensive Slang
1. Used as a disparaging term for a mentally retarded person.
Which I interpret as being contravening the spirit of the above guideline, for obvious reasons.
re·tard·ed, re·tard·ing, re·tards
To cause to move or proceed slowly; delay or impede.
verb (used with object)
1.
to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.
verb (used without object)
2.
to be delayed.
You were being a retard in hindering and slowing the progress of the biocentrism thread, with unrelated comments. ''tiz sock'......''smalls drawer''
Conclusion no offence provided as the cap fits. If you have chosen to take that comment in a subjective disparaging manner that's your issue not mine.
About your first point ''(ii)
Only one member account is allowed per person. ''
That's pure speculation on your behalf, I provided information about who I was and why I came to this forum on my opening post.
So if you have
any evidence that I have broken a forum rule, please stop posing illusionary arguments and get to the actual fact.
EDIT
knobmeup wrote
Mike...Maybe not...Sock...definitely.
definitely speculation, so you're
retarding my progress as a poster on this forum with speculative allegations.
How sad and unhelpful.
Your contention that you were using the word to say I was slowing the thread down is many things. Lame, desperate, sad, pathetic.....
We all know what meaning of the word you employ and the fact you find that acceptable says an awful lot about the contents of your brainbox. It is also unacceptable in this forum under the community guidelines you agreed to.
There are good reasons to ask you if you are a previous poster. For one, you have singled out certain members of the forum in no time at all, saying things like "as always" about them. There is strong implication there that you have history with some of the posters here.
You say that you had the same frothy ID at the DIF. I read here that that account lasted four months, till your arrival here. The posters you seem to have history with were all banned from the DIF a year before you joined it....Go figure. No doubt your DIF account is a sock too eh.
There are other reasons to question your sockness, have a think about that one for a bit though.