wake_up_bomb wrote:
But going back months, and certainly weeks, people left the site because they didn't feel they could express certain views, or that the forum wasn't inclusive. What views did they not feel they could express? And what element of themselves was excluded? I thought we were a pretty tolerant and welcoming site, and I would have been comfortable expressing any opinion here.
Hi WUB,
ok, I am going to attempt to address this, as it is obviously a relevant issue (perhaps more of an issue to others than to yourself, as the part of your post I have bolded is being repeatedly quoted by oioioi, who for one seems determined on some sort of clarification on the matter).
So, an example. Take a look at the thread I have linked below, posted several weeks ago by nirvana.
sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/General/56292-MA...E-CONFRONTATION.html
Do you see what is wrong there? I hope so...
Viewing that thread, would you say that nirvana has been given the benefit of the SZ 'clean slate policy'? I wouldn't. Rather, he has been subjected to the kind of passive/aggressive bullying behaviour as displayed in that thread from the moment he arrived here, based
solely upon previous preconceptions of him and his views/posts from back on the DIF...
not because of anything he has posted since arriving on SZ.
It is a classic example of what is wrong here. Nirvana isn't a so-called ''NAN'' as far as I'm aware. And in his OP in that thread, was he attempting to discuss 'race' ? No, he wasn't. But the implication made by the first person to reply to him in that thread was (a) that he
was attempting to do so, and, perhaps more significantly (b) that any discussion of race (ie ''race threads'') are not welcome on SZ full-stop.
Nirvana requested to be made inactive not long after that thread, as he clearly didn't feel comfortable expressing his opinions here. I wonder why?
I hope this post helps explain why so many people have quietly left the site.