batou wrote:
mikey.. i have a question for you and i dont mean to pry, i just know youre a pretty devout kinda guy. unintentional rhyme there.
You are not prying, in fact I am only too happy to try to answer you.
batou wrote:
do you take descriptions of the afterlife literally - is hell a place of fire and demons? is heaven baby angels with harps?
i was reading a book the other day, and it said modern clergy understood it to be metaphors.
I think perhaps all of the most difficult issues at the centre of existence are talked of in metaphors. In fact our modern concept of the literal being synonymous with the "real" is manifest in how we describe emotions and feelings as "all in our head" as if we perceived reality in any other way. This is especially true of positive feelings. Negative feelings we concede are "the reality" of a traumatic experience or even just a one requiring courage: after all bungee jumping merely requires gravity to take effect. As easy as falling off a log: literally and metaphorically. "However, " they say "you try it!" The experience of how one
feels there and then is suddenly the reality. It is even more likely that talk of positive feelongs like joy, contentment, fellowship and love will be described as "all in our head". When we speak of "really knowing somebody" we often refer to people's darker side. Oddly descriptions of Hell are much more common and vivd in art and culture than Heaven. This is especially true of modern times: Where is the heavenly equivilant of the horror film?
Reminding ourselves just what "real" has come to mean and how that has somehow been reduced to "literal" or "physical" helps us in understanding the question you have asked: What is Hell and Heaven. Is it literally real
or is it just a metaphor?
but this book was from the 70s, and the feeling i get from christians is that they believe such places exist,
Some people use the word "believe" to mean "I acccept without question because is is the ethos of the group I am with". They skip the hard work of scrutiny and reflection.
and when i went to church as a kid, thats what we were told. yet whesn i asked a priest what heaven was like he said its whatever you enjoy most, he said he loved waterskiing, and his heaven would be that... so, why am i so confused over these two styles of dantes inferno vs personal heaven.
You were a child and perhaps he was trying to convey to you that Heaven is not waterskiing or whatever your hobby is (I don't like waterskiing) but rather paradise is akin to that feeling he happens to get while waterskiing. That is putting it in a very superficial way but I guess you are a kid. Better maybe to say that somebody "in Hell" could never enjoy waterskiing or anything else for that matter because his or her own spitefulness, envy, hate etc could not allow him or her too. Only by waterskiing where other people were not allowed to (Pride) or where he disturbed others (cruelty) might please him.
i realize this turned into a ramble fest.. but i dont really get much chance to ask someone when i have the thought in my head, and i respect you, so thats why i ask. if i dont ask now, i may never know.
That is the brilliant thing about SZ. I hope my attempt at an answer was in some way helpful.