mikey mikey wrote:
She might have already known she was going to abuse the trust before she took the job...she might have even gone into teaching to get close to young lads so she could fuck them.

It goes without saying that a lot of these sexual predators take jobs specifically to get near to young people and kids.

StarsChildren wrote:
Sums up people for me that does, useless and sex crazed

And some of us derailed the sexy nipples thread with biscuit and cake talk.

yeah you freaking cookie monsters! derail a perfectly good thread with nipplage in it to talk about fucking cookies! and CAKES! how dare you

irrepressible wrote:
Spot on!

Hence why many institutions are infiltrated because they aim to educate and care for the vunerable.

The BBC, SS and even the Church are painted as institutionalised nonce shopping malls but the original intent was the opposite. THAT is the evil of corruption. It aims to exploit the best in us.

It's a win-win for the evil, yes Evil, that we lose faith in our best intentions. Who the fuck gave a shit when we found that mercs in Blackwater were trading in child prostitutes?

Nobody except honest soldiers.

Nonces and pederasts (she is a pederast BTW) not only wish to get away with their crimes but when caught know full well that they are destabilising the very institutions that were built as a defence against them.

They do a full CRB check on teaching assistants before letting them be on their own with kids though, so she must not have been caught out before.

CRB checks could be ineffectual as you rightly point out.

They just punish people with a record for dope, brawling and shoplifting and the Savilles of the world walk right into orphanages

mikey mikey wrote:
I wouldn't say those institutions were built as a defense against them but certainly not with the intent of harbouring them.
Damn this american bloody spellchecker!

We'll chat in person more on this I bet