He met a woman who lives about a thousand miles away while on a job that lasted three months, and fell in love with her.

They are dating she owns businesses, he lives by the seat of his pants and is broke most of the time.

Question,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Would she consider taking on a guy who doesn't have the financial capabilities as her, or even remotely like hers, for love, even
*which I don't think she loves him* and is his fantasy and move him in with her?

Would she or won't she there is going to be a ultimatum BY HIM TO HER on a short trip he's taking back to see her

Can't help on the answers you seek there rick but I can say that money, as in who's got what and who hasn't, shouldn't ever come into these things far as I'm concerned

maybe.. i mean its kinda weird you think its about $$
i think if he puts her ankles on his shoulders she might forget he's a peon.
thats how i work my way up to moderator here.
i started with diamondgeezer and novum. but turns out that was just preparing the soil.
so i look at the power structure and cliques and make my moves.
my rags to riches story is an inspiration for your friend and for people the world over.
my advice is worth its weight in gold.

batou wrote:

batou wrote:
If he as you say had outstanding sexual prowess and could become her toy maybe, but for a strong business woman to take on a weird computer nerd I think not,

and he is going to get his feelings hurt

And personally I think money is the reason for many so called love relationships to break up

ok heres my prediction
he comes back with tail between his legs, buys blow up doll and cuddle pillow and you never see him again except at comicon but dont recognize him because he's dressed up like aquaman.

batou wrote:
Oh jeeez!!
/runs off to bog again

She may have made all that money with the intent of being able to have any man she wants and not just seeking one that could provide for her.

oioioi wrote:
Good answer

psketti wrote:
I take the converse approach, I have absolutely fuck all therefore know no woman is with me for my money

I cannot possibly help you without some close-up, shirt off type photos of this young man, Rick.

I'm sorry.

oioioi wrote:
I was going to thank you for that post till I noticed the number syncronicity for both our thankyou's

You must think that only people in the same income bracket should mate, Rick. The only benefit of that is that both parties know the other isn't gold-digging I suppose. But if they're real soul mates, I can't see money, or lack of it, being relevant.

I'm going to play devil's advocate here. I would wary about entering into a relationship with a man like that if I were her, I'd be worried that he would turn out to be a cocklodger.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
I'm not having that in my Google history!

What's one of them?

I predict he'll see her, make his ultimatum, she'll tell him it's too soon, he'll want to carry on seeing her & keep pestering.

Is a cocklodger somebody who gets free rent through good use of his weapon?

oioioi wrote:
It's a bloke who moves in with a woman, or spends most of his time at her house and constributes nothing financially, while being fed and generally having everything provided for him. My son's dad was a cocklodger.

Space Bandit wrote:
Yes, but sadly they often don't even need to be able to use their weapon well. They just need to find an overly accomodating, gullible woman who is blinded my love.

I prefer the term 'stay at home dad'



Mind you she was my 'pussylodger' (!) for the best part of her stay in Manchester.

oioioi wrote:
Yes, but a stay at hom dad is doing his share. Cocklodgers don't contribute financially, and they don't contribute at all either. You can probably tell that it's a derogatory term.

My son's dad couldn't have been called a stay at home dad, he was just a cocklodger.