feather wrote:

Ooo Ooooo I know.....Me......I know...............

Is it cos he's a cunt?

perhaps RB (Russel Brand) is an illumanti handler who has moved on from Katy Perry to Jemina Khan ?


or perhaps he is being handled ?

or mayb e he is a guy in the limelight that got the chance to szhag an older rich women

knobmeup wrote: I have yet to see evidence to the contrary so you may well be onto something there Mr Meup.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
Oh. I thought that was what you were implying. Will you now confirm with a simple answer of yes or no whether you think Brand resembles a Champagne Socialist?

dawnbreak wrote:
Dearest dawnbreak.
I don't dislike socialists, liberals, tories, etc....
I don't disagree with people having money or not having money.
The reasons that I disagree with RB is because he keeps doing what he says that he disagrees with.
I don't dislike RB I just think he's an insincere wankshaft, I don't take any notice of his presentations. <<< as genuine

As previously stated better comedians than he have made the same points.
There is no way that RB has recently 'woken up' to this as other comedians that he would know have been going on about the same fucking issues for years.

So how could RB have only just realized about his recent 'revelations' and woken up about such issues
( for gilly )

TAFTA will elevate corporations to the status of nation states.
Anyone care to explain how this is Marxist?

I paraphrase for certain but ....
Was it not Comrade Lenin who stated that after the revolution we would all be riding in 1st class?
I assume the drinks menu would also reflect that.

Ergo a Champagne Socialist would be in front of the curve surely.

Putting (for Gilly) after something that doesn't answer any of the questions I plainly put to you doesn't cut it, fool.

mikey mikey wrote:
No, he resembles a hypocrite, his political view only acts as a vehicle for his hypocrisy, a socialist could be a billionaire for all I care, providing they don't start behaving in ways that are hypocritical to their words.

I'm not attacking his political views, only that we all know it's not new stuff, he's not just woken up to it all, he's known all along what's what with the political system, the environment and the concept of msm propaganda.

Only a fool would believe that he's only just realized those issues

About a dozen pages too late but

Effectively closing any and all debate about Russell's interview and follow up dialogues.

Well done Frothy.

Gilly wrote:
I'm not expecting you to answer questions.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
She did anyway. You just ignored her.

Figures.

It's trolling, pure and simple.
Nothing to contribute except wind-ups.

Cousin_Frothy wrote: As far as I'm concerned. That is the moment this:

Became this:
Posting rights....

And why the fuck would you when you keep dodging mine while trying to cover your cowardice with smileys?

Agreed.

andyh wrote:
Is it just me that defines what's going on today as corporatism then?

feather wrote:
The difference being that you're not on television attempting to get other people to have a revolution..

ffs you're half asleep feather.

mikey mikey wrote:
I didn't ask her a question.