mikey mikey wrote:
Mikey I really am struggling to get this into your head.
I'm not on about RB's wealth..... please let that sink in before you carry on reading this post.

What I'm saying again is that RB now disagrees with the msm and his 'old ways'.
If that is the honest situation then he ought not be living of the money from what he regrets doing, he could give it to charity and start again doing something else.

I'm not saying he should not have any particular amount of money, just that he ought not be living from the funds of what he disagrees with again.
He seems to be so often doing what he disagrees with, public spectacles, loving elites, living off of msm Wonga !!

What ever next.... Oh I must be a right winger because I've not fallen for that cunts bullshit

mikey mikey wrote:
I don't object to them at all.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
So it's the socialism, then. Sorry "Marxism/Communism"

hokay
Cousin_Frothy wrote:
No you're a wingnut for claiming that Cameron is a socialist and backing it up with a wingnut establishment journo. Whose bullshit you don't seem to have a problem with

mikey mikey wrote:
msm insider wankshafter yes.

dawnbreak wrote: You did nothing wrong there btw.
That image won't link because:

a: License Copyright All rights reserved by carhandle

b: Flicker Won't let you hotlink unless the uploader granted permission, Which is rare.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
That runs contrary to what you posted in post #158
sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/General/93198-ru...axman.html?start=140

mikey mikey wrote:
Get with the programme Mikey I said that there are lots of reports emerging that Cameron's 'big society; is a Marxist concept and Cameron refers to 'Saul Alinsky''

So it's not my opinion, it's simply reports.

I assume you'll not like Tommy Sheridon then frother

www.flickriver.com/photos/aberdeenfc/577275888/

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
Never have and never will.

And that's quite the Americanism dotty.

mikey mikey wrote:
Stop being so stupid Mikey I have not described RB as a champagne socialist, give it up you're clutching at straws

You are completely ignorant, Frothy.

You ignore the straight question of whether you've been here before with another user name.

You ignore the request to explain your 'blubber' comment.

You ignore when it's pointed out that the profession of comedian is what Brand still does, and has never claimed to regret or stand against now, and it's how he's earned his money. This completely negates your stupid crap about how he should feel obliged to give his money away - which is why you're ignoring it. Because you can't argue with it, and it spoils your fun.

You ignored the question posed re if writing for a particular publication can be used (supposedly) to make Brand out to be a cunt, does it also make other authors for it a cunt - such as John Pilger. If so, I'd like to hear your tirade about Pilger. If not, why not?

Your use of giggling emoticons indicates that you think you're being very clever. Can't you even see your own ignorance when it's presented to you, and you continually fail to address it?

mikey mikey wrote:
'program'

Ahem. Cough.

Ahh you did half your homework, I see.

Now answer Gilly ffs

Gilly wrote:
I'm not on about his stand up comedy you numpty, I mean all his MTV stuff and Movies that he now says is no longer him, if it's not him give that cash to a good cause, or keep it and remain a msm'er

mikey mikey wrote:
what number post did I use the term 'champagne socialist' ?#

I'm struggling to understand why someone would be so fixated on what an entertainer said.

I hate tories. I worked for a time with PC World.
PC World/ Currys Dixons etc is owned by Sir Stanley Kalms the pre-dominant contributor to the Conservative party, who also owns power plants in Israel etc

Should I return my salary for the period I worked for him or be labelled a hypocrite?

You occupy a very simplistic world frothy.

Cousin_Frothy wrote: Why are you dodging Gilly?

Once again: the man has to impoverish himself in order to have a voice. Cancel his career as a comedian and ditch his girlfriend. If not, we cannot even talk about his POV without being deemed worshippers and dupes.

However, wealthy journos writing for the New Statesman and the Telegraph and Fail can be relied upon to tell us about how Cameron is a Marxist because he mentioned some bloke in a speech.

What a load of shit.