dubmeup wrote:
Weeman wrote:
dubmeup wrote:
Ofc anyone who were interested could always run a poll...

A poll is only worthwhile
after gathering side A and B through discussion - then asking the question 'Should we do X Y or Z.'?
A poll would be redundant now because that didn't happen.
A murderer is a murderer - no mitigating circumstances will be entertained.

Sorry buddy but you're off the mark.
It would be entirely possible to start a poll right now with the choices, lift ban, keep ban.
The op could concisely give enough info for anyone to make an informed choice.
The ban was correctly implemented. All beit a bit late.
What happens next is down to btfroth and the members.
So far all i see is me being asked questions

and some gifs and quips.
No one has cared enough to start a poll. I've done it. Did it with sod. Was the top voted poll for a good while iirc.

Not sure how I'm off the mark with my observations ........
I couldn't be the OP of a poll anyway as I can't "concisely give enough info for anyone to make an informed choice".
The best person to do that isn't here
I have asked questions [not necessarily of you] so that I
could make an informed opinion. They haven't been answered as yet.
This does however beg the question [again, not singling you out] how we ended up having retrospective dialogue on a forum billed as consensus led?
The gifs = humour - The quips such as "A murderer is a murderer - no mitigating circumstances will be entertained " appears well suited to what has transpired.......
or not.