wildhorse wrote:
2 lesbos who work for SS who know each other 70 miles apart.

Not ALL lesbo's

dubmeup wrote:
I've never seen his nipples, sex-pot. xxx

I was perving over the men in chat last night...even hoping to see some bits and pieces.

Sadly I didn't .

It's best not to take life too seriously.

pheony wrote:
But but but you're so shy So what time are we all meeting in chat tonight then? I remember what was pledged

dubmeup wrote:
I'll be there tonight.

I never said I'd get my kit off though.

andyh wrote:
Dearest, reasonable and usually very sound thinking Andy...would you concede that perhaps, just perhaps, whether or not these two woman are "lesbos", they actually know of each other because they both work for social services? And would it not also be fair to say that you have perhaps rightly so, presumed them to be gay for reasons best known to yourself, without actually knowing whether or not they are?

Surely, you can appreciate, as vehemently as you sometimes argue your point regarding race, that some people will have read that and thought it completely out of character for you, not to mention utterly in opposition to your usual stance on these matters?

I know I did.

Posting this: in response, might be construed in the same way as someone who has just referred quite seriously to all white people as "honkies" posting the same thing and not really thinking anything of it. I know you may not think it is the same thing, but for many it is. It's all just language at the end of the day and very often, little attention is paid to the actual 'intent' behind that language.

Whatever your motivations, I hope you get where I'm coming from. I'll say no more about it as it's just too fekking hot to argue.

Ab Origine wrote:



It is 2 women. Just TWO women, not the entire SS, not even the entire child stealing..I mean..care department :p

They're in bed with each other Abs, I know because they do not hide the fact they are openly publically lesbian and they both visited me after I moved...together. Some things are really monumentally obvious lol.

Did I go visit their house and try to sneak a peek? No, I wasn't that inclined as they were both hags, now if they were 20 well that'd be different LOL!! (thats called a joke wildhorse)

Its STILL bloody raining here by the way, no heat yet.

pheony wrote: I don't recall you being asked to my dear. Why ever would you bring up such an idea? Or did IAAIA send you a PM in there that I don't know about? Norty IAAIA

dubmeup wrote:
If you remember rightly dubs....It wasn't my top that IAAIA wanted off. .....It was someone elses

I said it..... just so yall know.

andyh wrote:
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one then, andy. I'm sweating my "bo bos" (thanks jhado ) off right now. It's very, very hot and everyone is semi-nekkid outside...so quite why I'm sat indoors talking to you losers is beyond me.

Am off for a perv before the rain comes back.

Ab Origine wrote:

curtain cat wrote:
One thing i am not a woman so your wrong on that supposition and the rest of your home brew physiological profiling is incorrect.
0/0

I think you are referring back the the David Icke forum the time when i posted something about my great/grandfather and his brother both getting mustard gassed in the trenches in the first world war and the first reply that came back was you saying booh hoo this is so depressing and no body wants to hear about it,you cheeky fecker and i pm'd you calling you a nazi cunt or something like that.

Yeah i guess i did over react a bit regarding my wariness of people on this forum with members of this forum saying that they had visits from the social services,cant be to careful though as this forum could be made of people from a weird cult or something.

As for some people being selfish and shit parents its documented in court cases/newspapers/internet and common knowledge.

andyh wrote: andyh wrote:
Tbf andy, you did post this ^^^ which is a little more generalised than saying "I had bad experience with two grumpy old grotbag social workers who I'm pretty sure were Lesbian"

Just saying

EDIT: I did think it rather out of character for you tbh and I do appreciate it was most likely just an unwise witticism. I for one aint gonna hang you for it.....I've been known to make the odd unwise witticism myself

dubmeup wrote:
Yeah true dub­meup!
He showed his true colours which is always good.

humanspirit wrote:
And I did clarfiy AFTER that post.
Something some people round here seem incapable of doing of late....let alone reading it.

FTR as in my edit up there ^^^ I don't think that now clarified comment represents andy's true colours at all.

Bloody hell

I think andyh has probably got the message now .....or are we going to put him in the stocks and throw tomatoes at him for good measure.

pheony wrote:
Apparently I have to type the clarification a third time.
I'd probably prefer the tomatoes :p

wildhorse wrote:


For wildhorse

Hi Andyh you will have to forgive me cos I'm just having a little giggle at your situation right now cos only the other day you pulled ME up for generalising about Gurkhas!

The hyposcrisy

(I had to repost this, becuase I accidently deleted it. D'Oh!)