Frog wrote:
Thanks frog.

I am aware and perhaps should have been clearer in my post. Researching material from folks such as Gerrish in the past it did strike me that a lot of it gets bundled up with some quite hateful stuff about particular groups and whatnot. That's all I really meant...I can conceive that even some of that could well be by design.

Steevo wrote: I'll spare the details but suffice to say that my experience of SS is that it is one of the organizations that really does need kicking the fuck into touch.

Steevo wrote:
Its pretty much a common theme throughout positions authority.
SS = childless lesbo lefty freaks
Judges = criminals
Police = thugs
Politicians = no fucking clue
Journalists = copy/paste from wikipedia

andyh wrote:

Ab Origine wrote:
Theres 3 I know in Kendal alone
Not all of them are that way ofc...but a hell of a lot are, in fact a disproportionate amount are and thats worrying.

I shall take my leave of this thread before the going gets rough, I think!

Tata all xx

Ab Origine wrote:
AbO, the fact of the matter is that all groups are a subdivision of society and all the divisions are used for political gain regardless of religion, gender or any other orientation. CP is pure social and political engineering based on manipulation using group dynamics and NLP etc. They use everything they can to subvert communities and family units. They are heavily involved with furthering the EU take over of the UK. They will soon be the trainers appointed to the top levels of parliament. Ignoring them or the information about them is probably not the best approach given their methods and areas of interest.

andyh wrote: For the record, my dislike of SS is born of how utterly shite they were when my kids let me know that their new stepdad was beating them. None of them were "childless lesbo lefty freaks". and tbh I couldn't have given less of a shite if they were. What pissed me off was something that actually mattered. Namely they were fucking shite. At the time a friend was looking after her nephew who had similarly not been treated well, the SS were fucking shite in that case too.

SS = child­less lesbo lefty freaks .....................did you actually just say that AndyH

there are no words

dawnbreak wrote:
In Kendal and Durham they are, thats two locations too many imho.
They are over-represented in certain jobs and few ppl seem to notice.

I'm not sure what sexual orientation has to do with it. Gay, straight, not sure... I don't care. It's irrelevant, because the most important thing is having the right intentions.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
They hate men. Thats the problem tbh.
Didn't someone say a while back the SS have targets for children to split from families?

andyh wrote:
Idk Andy, I would say it's more a case of them loving women

Tbh in my home town I knew a 2 lesbian couples who had children and they were very nice people. I don't think being gay makes people anti-family.

You're entitled to your opinion of course. I just don't look at people as homosexual or hetrosexual, people are just sexual imo.

Specifically anti-paternal Les.

The traditional family unit is being replaced by a new 'norm' which is a single mother on benefits.
Like it or not, it takes a man and a woman to start a family. Thats the way its always been, it won't be the case in a transhumanistic future with test tube babies and incubators and brain implants though.
The greatest achievement of social engineering is the destruction of the family unit, once you have that feat accomplished anything is possible from then on.

Sure a couple of lesbians or gays can adopt a kid, they can't make a kid though...yet.

Gay couples can make a kid. They just need to find a rent-a-womb or a sperm donor Some gay couples want to be parents, but I don't think that should be tied into the transhumanist agenda. I can understand that some people aren't comfortable with it, but I just think we should let people be happy and live the life they choose to live.

I agree with you on the family unit thing though. I was a single parent for many years and also claimed benefit. Tbh I didn't ever decide that I wanted to go down that route, my sons father was irresponsible, cheated on me and was verbally and emotionally abusive. I have often wondered why people accept this sort of behaviour as a matter of course from men, but if I had behaved the same I would have been viewed as some sort of social pariah. Even now he doesn't pay maintenance, and I still get peeved at the fact that he has taken no responsibility for contributing towards raising our son.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote: Yeah, its still not the same because both parents involved are not making the child, they have to borrow an egg from a mother.
The day will come when both a mother and a father are unnecessary.
Sure it shouldn't be tied in to the transhumanistic agenda unfortunately it is happening regardless.

Just part of the overall agenda, remove mens sense of responsibility and womens need for men and you have a dangerous sea shift in the big social picture.
The whole chav scene is a direct result of it imho.
The key thing that the social engineering has done is to make people afraid of responsibility, to make them think only of the self.
As per the doc 'century of the self'.

Money at the end of the day drives it, if we could ever envisage a world without it then you could BOTH have your cake and eat it.
People tend not to think that far outside the box, I guess the fluoride helps in that dept.

But I don't think this double standard for men and women is a new thing. Traditionally a woman was the one who bore the brunt of shame and the social stigma of having a child out of wedlock. The whole thing about absent fathers is just an extension of this in my eyes.

Personally I think it's a throwback to outdated Christian values.

I can see how a potential Brave New World scenario could easily develop. I don't think we need to be alarmed about gay couples having children though. It's the rich elite that we need to be keeping a beady eye on.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote: You know how I feel about religion
Yet I seem to have more values and morals than the lot of them, I wonder why

I think we will probably have to fight them at some point. I don't think merely keeping an eye on them is going to work.

andyh wrote:
Andy I am disappoint. I normally hold your views in high regard but in this thread you've talked some utter shite.
Here's an interesting fact for you:

The SS twat that was in charge of looking into the shit my kids were being made to endure was, shock horror, a fucking man. A married man with children
It's fair to say that I've had quite a bit of contact with SS in the past few years and in my experience the male/female split is pretty balanced. I've really never thought to ask any of them what their sexuality is.

I suspect from what you've written here that you have NO first hand experience of the SS and have built the views you've expressed here on an apparent dislike of lesbians mixed with a good dose of bullshit you've read .

Frog wrote:
Politicians are but mere puppets to these organisations, soldiers on the ground...these organisations are the real governments.