silvershine wrote:
I am slightly familiar with what cointel is.....
Since you were a mod on another forum, I am guessing that you are more than "slighlty" familiar with the notion of cointelpro.
silvershine wrote:
It could be strawman,
Are you sure you mean "strawman": i.e.
misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.
silvershine wrote:
has any of the info given been proven?
Yes.
silvershine wrote:
There can be so much confusion created, you get sent around in circles not knowing what to believe, you start going in one direction and then something else comes about and you don't know where you are with it, its all tactical. They know what they are doing, they certainly know......
Actally there is little confusion but a lot of misinformation and conflation.
The people responsible are:
1. wingnut media pundits, journalists and anti leaks (representing the US governemt and the corporations that wikileaks exposed).
2, So called "liberal" or centre or centre left journalsists that at first supported wikileaks until the CIA set up the rape smears and the governement bared its teeth. They have now stuck the knife in.
3. The "conspiracy" pundits that have either been motivated by contrarianism (dusthead's theory) or more likely have found that wikileaks does not really fit that Ron Paul view of Murika. Militias are patriots after all.
4. Nazis and BNP types that see jews behind everything icluding Christmas lights (rodin). They certainly didn't forgive wikileaks for that BNP members list leak.