Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

Poll: Apollo Moon Landing

Yes Bar 13 39.4%
No Bar 7 21.2%
I cant possibly know Bar 13 39.4%
Total number of voters: 33 ( Micklar, Evie, mild_peril, marina, Quality Street ) See more
Only registered users can participate to this poll

TOPIC: Did man land on the moon in 1969?

Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 04:06 #1

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder 
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 4125
  • Thank you received: 2306
  • Karma: 0
What do people think?
Y11
Last Edit: 06 May 2012 05:53 by novum.
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 10:13 #2

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 13:00 #3

  • diamondgeezer
  • diamondgeezer's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3032
  • Thank you received: 1504
  • Karma: 89
I personally think man has landed on the moon.

Not necessarily in 1969 however... ;)
truth-zone.co.uk/ - the other place...

The pen is mightier than the sword
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 13:11 #4

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
Care to elaborate? :spliff:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 13:16 #5

  • diamondgeezer
  • diamondgeezer's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3032
  • Thank you received: 1504
  • Karma: 89
Do you think this modern 'civilization' of ours is the first one to have developed the technology capable of space travel?

;)
truth-zone.co.uk/ - the other place...

The pen is mightier than the sword
Last Edit: 26 Apr 2012 13:18 by diamondgeezer.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 13:20 #6

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
Well... going by some of the things that have been discovered in icebergs, various rock formations and other millions of year old objects... no :D

Again though, these are only things I've crossed briefly in books from time to time so I know very little.
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 13:36 #7

  • diamondgeezer
  • diamondgeezer's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3032
  • Thank you received: 1504
  • Karma: 89
And, wouldn't you say that there is *convincing evidence* that in the past mankind has been in close contact with alien species?

The pyramids for a start...we haven't got the technology to build something that mathematically accurate today.

I personally believe that we are being closely watched by intelligent alien life forms. Species that have been in contact with us in the distant past. Before our scattered societies developed into this monumental global fuck-up controlled by psychopaths.

If you were a benign intelligent alien species (or more likely not just one species but an allied group of them), would you try & make contact with us in the state we're in now?
truth-zone.co.uk/ - the other place...

The pen is mightier than the sword
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 Apr 2012 17:52 #8

  • Abs
  • Abs's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • How are you thinking today?
  • Posts: 6891
  • Thank you received: 3940
  • Karma: 112
diamondgeezer wrote:
I personally think man has landed on the moon.

Not necessarily in 1969 however... ;)

Were I to go out on a bit of a limb (not having any evidence whatsoever) I'd say I tend to agree, DG.

I think we were already there tbh. Or at the very least, we know full well what is actually there already. That whole episode in recent history was about PR for the most part.

Goodness only knows what "we've" been up to, up there, but you can bet your arse it would serve no useful purpose for the plebs back on terra to have the slightest inkling about it.
What we are today comes from our thoughts of yesterday, and our present thoughts build our life of tomorrow: Our life is the creation of our mind.

-Buddha
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 27 Apr 2012 12:03 #9

  • hollowII
  • hollowII's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 111
  • Thank you received: 25
  • Karma: 7
What no truegroup telling us how wrong we are? Bliss...
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 29 Apr 2012 20:50 #10

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
The distance reflector puts it beyond doubt that mans has been there, question is just when is all.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 06 May 2012 01:12 #11

  • Mrindigo
  • Mrindigo's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 787
  • Thank you received: 677
  • Karma: 53
diamondgeezer wrote:
Do you think this modern 'civilization' of ours is the first one to have developed the technology capable of space travel?

;)

I think man did land on the moon, but the exact details I think are more complicated than the simplistic history lesson most of us are accustom to. I like the little hint you made toward previously advanced human civilizations, and later a potential extraterrestrial influence, Diamond. :thumbup:

When I think of the events that led up to the space race, I can't but help but question the official story of the lunar landing. It's no secret that the Russians and Americans had help with developing their space programs from acquired Nazi SS scientists, via Operation paperclip. The things the Nazis had developed were far ahead of their time. The rocket used to bring lunar lander out of Earth's atmosphere was based off of Wernher Von Braun's v2 rocket.

Where did their inspiration come from? I won't knock brilliance because of depravity, as the Nazis were certainly depraved. It's interesting to note the interest the Nazis had in mythology, and tracing it's roots. That eventually lead them to India and Nepal. After studying the various religious texts, it's alleged they 'stumbled upon' some detailed ancient blueprints for flying machines and advanced propulsion systems amongst the ancient documents. These were said to be copied and brought back to Germany. Combine this with the strange channeling of the Vril society, and you have strange happenings. Fu-fighters zipping by allied fighters and bombers, weird bell-shaped crafts seen flying around, silver rotating discs, and silent illuminated flying crafts all were sighted throughout WWII and into to the 1950's. There were a few people who talked to Von Braun (Allen Greenfield,Carol Rosin), who claimed he told them they were helped by ETs.

One thing bothers me though about the lunar landing and the trip there. There exists a fairly potent area between the moon and Earth comprised of intense radiation and electromagnetism called the Van Allen belt.

350px Van Allen Radiation Belt.svg


My issue is how they were able shield the astronauts and sensitive equipment on board. I asked this question on DIF when I was still active, and was given an answer I thought was amusing. I was told they flew over the belt, as if it were some two-dimensional donut shaped object. The problem there is the other intense gamma rays and bursts emanating from the sun outside of the range of the belt. Either way the astronauts would have been heavily exposed to radiation and electromagnetism. I don't proclaim to be an aeronautics and astronautics engineer, so I can't tell you how any of components were designed, manufactured, and assembled. The question still remains though, how did they shield from that? The two most common things used for blocking radiation are lead and concrete mixtures. A less commonly used material, but more effective, is gold. Both gold and lead are very dense would have made it difficult for liftoff with the added weight I think would be required to effectively shield the cosmic energy. So then what are we left with?

Allegedly the Nazis were heavily involved with some directed energy technology. Most of the research on that is focused on sound, laser, and microwave technology. How-ever there was some research that focused on ionized plasma technology. It's interesting that after the fall of Nazi regime in 1945, the Russians would begin R & D on various applications of plasma technology, likely aided by acquired former Nazi SS. There are several theories, papers, and even patents which utilize forms of plasma and magnetism for radiation shielding.

What I have been wondering is if NASA was using repurposed plasma/directed energy tech for radiation blocking? They were using the v2, and other Nazi developed forms of technology, so I don't think it's entirely out of the question.

There are many ancient cultures who have some interesting mythology related to the moon, and 'gods' that inhabited it. Could that have been the motivation for going there, maybe in hopes of bringing back any leftover technology? Personally I wonder if they got there, and found that it wasn't entirely abandoned... I think it might explain why no one has been back there officially since, otherwise I suspect the planetary resources initiative would have happened a long time ago.
Form is merely a momentary manifestation of being, not a fixed reality.

History doesn't repeat itself, uninformed people repeat history.

To all progressive endeavors great or small, come unforeseen benefits on a scale larger than most give pause or contemplation of.
Last Edit: 06 May 2012 01:14 by Mrindigo.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: domathy, K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 06 May 2012 05:41 #12

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder 
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 4125
  • Thank you received: 2306
  • Karma: 0
Mrindigo wrote:
Where did their inspiration come from? I won't knock brilliance because of depravity, as the Nazis were certainly depraved. It's interesting to note the interest the Nazis had in mythology, and tracing it's roots. That eventually lead them to India and Nepal. After studying the various religious texts, it's alleged they 'stumbled upon' some detailed ancient blueprints for flying machines and advanced propulsion systems amongst the ancient documents. These were said to be copied and brought back to Germany. Combine this with the strange channeling of the Vril society, and you have strange happenings. Fu-fighters zipping by allied fighters and bombers, weird bell-shaped crafts seen flying around, silver rotating discs, and silent illuminated flying crafts all were sighted throughout WWII and into to the 1950's. There were a few people who talked to Von Braun (Allen Greenfield,Carol Rosin), who claimed he told them they were helped by ETs.

I posted about the 'winged sun disc' here...

sanctumzone.co.uk/component/kunena/16-sy...m.html?Itemid=0#1184

It seems like that image was around in old civilizations, sometimes depicted with beings on board.

It also seems to (possibly) have been stylized into what we know as horus symbolism today, that is prevalent everywhere, albeit esoteric.

Maybe that has something to do with what you wrote, i dont know.
Y11
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 06 May 2012 17:45 #13

  • Mrindigo
  • Mrindigo's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 787
  • Thank you received: 677
  • Karma: 53
novum wrote:
Mrindigo wrote:
Where did their inspiration come from? I won't knock brilliance because of depravity, as the Nazis were certainly depraved. It's interesting to note the interest the Nazis had in mythology, and tracing it's roots. That eventually lead them to India and Nepal. After studying the various religious texts, it's alleged they 'stumbled upon' some detailed ancient blueprints for flying machines and advanced propulsion systems amongst the ancient documents. These were said to be copied and brought back to Germany. Combine this with the strange channeling of the Vril society, and you have strange happenings. Fu-fighters zipping by allied fighters and bombers, weird bell-shaped crafts seen flying around, silver rotating discs, and silent illuminated flying crafts all were sighted throughout WWII and into to the 1950's. There were a few people who talked to Von Braun (Allen Greenfield,Carol Rosin), who claimed he told them they were helped by ETs.

I posted about the 'winged sun disc' here...

sanctumzone.co.uk/component/kunena/16-sy...m.html?Itemid=0#1184

It seems like that image was around in old civilizations, sometimes depicted with beings on board.

It also seems to (possibly) have been stylized into what we know as horus symbolism today, that is prevalent everywhere, albeit esoteric.

Maybe that has something to do with what you wrote, i dont know.

I do think that the Egyptian symbolism and mythology did play a role. It's literally everywhere now where ancient influence meets modern day power structures. Even the Vatican has Egyptian artifacts. Symbolism seems like it could have been multipurpose, conveying several esoteric concepts. The eye of Horus does indeed appear like it could refer to flying objects, possibly of extraterrestrial or previously advanced human civilization origins. I like your thread by the way! Very interesting topic.
Form is merely a momentary manifestation of being, not a fixed reality.

History doesn't repeat itself, uninformed people repeat history.

To all progressive endeavors great or small, come unforeseen benefits on a scale larger than most give pause or contemplation of.
Last Edit: 06 May 2012 17:46 by Mrindigo.
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 23 May 2012 00:51 #14

  • wake_up_bomb
  • wake_up_bomb's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 5063
  • Thank you received: 4418
  • Karma: 56
I'm not sure what the significance of this article is, but it's certainly quite odd:

www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/573785...efore-Americans.html

Russian spacecraft landed on moon hours before Americans

A previously unheard recording of a Russian spacecraft attempting to beat NASA's Apollo 11 in 1969's race to the moon has been released.

In July 1969, the telescopes at the Jodrell Bank Observatory, in Cheshire, were tracking the Americans' Eagle Lander carrying astronauts towards the moon's surface.

Sir Bernard Lovell, the astronomer, was among the team listening to transmissions coming from the area of space and began tracking the unmanned Soviet spacecraft Luna 15, which was trying to collect samples of lunar soil and rock and then return to Earth before the US mission.

The recordings from Jodrell's Lovell radio telescope, which were hidden in archives until researchers found them, show the Russian craft orbited the Moon and crash-landed onto its surface at 15:50 on July 21 – just a few hours before the Americans lifted off.

In the newly released recordings, which were made over three days, Sir Bernard, the founder of Jodrell Bank, can be heard narrating events with conversation from the Apollo 11 astronauts in the background.

Sir Bernard notes a change in the orbit of Luna 15 to take it closer to the US landing site and later reports a rumour from a "well-informed source in Moscow" that the craft is about to land.

People in Jodrell's control room can then be heard shouting "it's landing" and "it's going down much too fast" as they track Luna 15's final moments before it crashes.

A voice is later heard saying: "I say, this has really been drama of the highest order."

The recordings have been released by The University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Moon landings.
The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. The true measure of a man is this: how quickly he can respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give - Philip K. Dick.
Last Edit: 23 May 2012 00:51 by wake_up_bomb.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Space Bandit

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 26 May 2012 20:31 #15

  • domathy
  • domathy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 272
  • Thank you received: 57
  • Karma: 13
psketti wrote:
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.

I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: psketti, K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 28 May 2012 15:13 #16

  • ronisron
  • ronisron's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • In the Zone.......
  • Posts: 490
  • Thank you received: 323
  • Karma: 34
domathy wrote:
psketti wrote:
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.

I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.

I think Kubrick filmed the "Moon Landing" too, Jay Weidner did that great video called Kubrick's Odyssey and showed all the correlations between the moon "set" and the 2001 set. There were definite references to it in The Shining as well.

I don't doubt they've been to the moon in one way or another, I think they faked the landing films so they could control what was being shown to the viewing audience -- "NOTHING TO SEE HERE,JUST SOME SAND AND ROCKS.."
"Though the rules of the road have been lodged, it's only people's games you've got to dodge.."
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mrindigo, K-Bone

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 28 May 2012 17:07 #17

  • Mrindigo
  • Mrindigo's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 787
  • Thank you received: 677
  • Karma: 53
ronisron wrote:
domathy wrote:
psketti wrote:
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.

I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.

I think Kubrick filmed the "Moon Landing" too, Jay Weidner did that great video called Kubrick's Odyssey and showed all the correlations between the moon "set" and the 2001 set. There were definite references to it in The Shining as well.

I don't doubt they've been to the moon in one way or another, I think they faked the landing films so they could control what was being shown to the viewing audience -- "NOTHING TO SEE HERE,JUST SOME SAND AND ROCKS.."

That's exactly what I think went down too, Ron. I think they got up there and found some things they didn't want the public to know about, thus the 'for tv' version of the landing may have been made.
Form is merely a momentary manifestation of being, not a fixed reality.

History doesn't repeat itself, uninformed people repeat history.

To all progressive endeavors great or small, come unforeseen benefits on a scale larger than most give pause or contemplation of.
You must register to post here.

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 28 May 2012 18:34 #18

  • ronisron
  • ronisron's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • In the Zone.......
  • Posts: 490
  • Thank you received: 323
  • Karma: 34
Mrindigo wrote:
ronisron wrote:
domathy wrote:
psketti wrote:
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.

I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.

I think Kubrick filmed the "Moon Landing" too, Jay Weidner did that great video called Kubrick's Odyssey and showed all the correlations between the moon "set" and the 2001 set. There were definite references to it in The Shining as well.

I don't doubt they've been to the moon in one way or another, I think they faked the landing films so they could control what was being shown to the viewing audience -- "NOTHING TO SEE HERE,JUST SOME SAND AND ROCKS.."

That's exactly what I think went down too, Ron. I think they got up there and found some things they didn't want the public to know about, thus the 'for tv' version of the landing may have been made.

Also to possibly hide the actual technology they were using to get there, and what they were using when they were there. Kubrick had conceptualized a whole moonbase and shuttle to and fro in "2001".....maybe another "clue"? I remember reading that the whole moon mission was computer controlled by a system that was akin to a 286 comp with about 8KB of RAM..... Then I thought; "I don't think so" :chuckle: . There was better computing technology available to the military and the fine folks at NASA than that.

All we ever see are their table scraps, we never get the main course.
"Though the rules of the road have been lodged, it's only people's games you've got to dodge.."
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: domathy

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 01 Jun 2012 01:49 #19

  • Mrindigo
  • Mrindigo's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 787
  • Thank you received: 677
  • Karma: 53
ronisron wrote:
Mrindigo wrote:
ronisron wrote:
domathy wrote:
psketti wrote:
Haven't looked into the theory as to whether they did or didn't to be honest. Stuck my head into threads on other places from time to time and ran back out again :emb:

If anyone's got any short, sharp, shock links that have some hard evidence that they didn't land, I'd be up for watching them some rainy day.

I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.

I think Kubrick filmed the "Moon Landing" too, Jay Weidner did that great video called Kubrick's Odyssey and showed all the correlations between the moon "set" and the 2001 set. There were definite references to it in The Shining as well.

I don't doubt they've been to the moon in one way or another, I think they faked the landing films so they could control what was being shown to the viewing audience -- "NOTHING TO SEE HERE,JUST SOME SAND AND ROCKS.."

That's exactly what I think went down too, Ron. I think they got up there and found some things they didn't want the public to know about, thus the 'for tv' version of the landing may have been made.

Also to possibly hide the actual technology they were using to get there, and what they were using when they were there. Kubrick had conceptualized a whole moonbase and shuttle to and fro in "2001".....maybe another "clue"? I remember reading that the whole moon mission was computer controlled by a system that was akin to a 286 comp with about 8KB of RAM..... Then I thought; "I don't think so" :chuckle: . There was better computing technology available to the military and the fine folks at NASA than that.

All we ever see are their table scraps, we never get the main course.

I couldn't agree more friend, I couldn't agree more. The idea that there's more computing power in a graphing calculator than there was in the NASA computers is funny. It does indeed point to undisclosed tech, some of which we're using now. :thumbup:
Form is merely a momentary manifestation of being, not a fixed reality.

History doesn't repeat itself, uninformed people repeat history.

To all progressive endeavors great or small, come unforeseen benefits on a scale larger than most give pause or contemplation of.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: domathy

Re: Did man land on the moon in 1969? 20 Jun 2012 00:34 #20

  • Space Bandit
  • Space Bandit's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3804
  • Thank you received: 2275
  • Karma: 70
wake_up_bomb wrote:
I'm not sure what the significance of this article is, but it's certainly quite odd:

www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/573785...efore-Americans.html

Russian spacecraft landed on moon hours before Americans

A previously unheard recording of a Russian spacecraft attempting to beat NASA's Apollo 11 in 1969's race to the moon has been released.

In July 1969, the telescopes at the Jodrell Bank Observatory, in Cheshire, were tracking the Americans' Eagle Lander carrying astronauts towards the moon's surface.

Sir Bernard Lovell, the astronomer, was among the team listening to transmissions coming from the area of space and began tracking the unmanned Soviet spacecraft Luna 15, which was trying to collect samples of lunar soil and rock and then return to Earth before the US mission.

The recordings from Jodrell's Lovell radio telescope, which were hidden in archives until researchers found them, show the Russian craft orbited the Moon and crash-landed onto its surface at 15:50 on July 21 – just a few hours before the Americans lifted off.

In the newly released recordings, which were made over three days, Sir Bernard, the founder of Jodrell Bank, can be heard narrating events with conversation from the Apollo 11 astronauts in the background.

Sir Bernard notes a change in the orbit of Luna 15 to take it closer to the US landing site and later reports a rumour from a "well-informed source in Moscow" that the craft is about to land.

People in Jodrell's control room can then be heard shouting "it's landing" and "it's going down much too fast" as they track Luna 15's final moments before it crashes.

A voice is later heard saying: "I say, this has really been drama of the highest order."

The recordings have been released by The University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Moon landings.

That's a new one on me...
interesting.
Set the controls for the heart of the earth.
You must register to post here.
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.201 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today567
Yesterday665
Week567
Month33717
Total1012074

Your IP Address: 216.73.217.60 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Monday, 27 April 2026 21:42

Who Is Online

Guests : 972 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel