I wonder what happened to NASA's attempts at controlling the weather?

grackus wrote:
I remember thelyran / Billy Ruben on DIF posting links to a 'climate pact' or similar, where countries had signed and agreed to not use technology that changes the weather in warfare against one another... at least thats what my memory recalls, that it was along those lines, it was a while back now.

Now, if they are signing pacts to not use shit against eachother, does this tell us that said shit does indeed exist?

One thing bothers me though about the lunar landing and the trip there. There exists a fairly potent area between the moon and Earth comprised of intense radiation and electromagnetism called the Van Allen belt.



My issue is how they were able shield the astronauts and sensitive equipment on board. I asked this question on DIF when I was still active, and was given an answer I thought was amusing. I was told they flew over the belt, as if it were some two-dimensional donut shaped object. The problem there is the other intense gamma rays and bursts emanating from the sun outside of the range of the belt. Either way the astronauts would have been heavily exposed to radiation and electromagnetism. I don't proclaim to be an aeronautics and astronautics engineer, so I can't tell you how any of components were designed, manufactured, and assembled. The question still remains though, how did they shield from that? The two most common things used for blocking radiation are lead and concrete mixtures. A less commonly used material, but more effective, is gold. Both gold and lead are very dense would have made it difficult for liftoff with the added weight I think would be required to effectively shield the cosmic energy. So then what are we left with?

I remember reading that the whole moon mission was computer controlled by a system that was akin to a 286 comp with about 8KB of RAM..... Then I thought; "I don't think so" . There was better computing technology available to the military and the fine folks at NASA than that.

All we ever see are their table scraps, we never get the main course.

I couldn't agree more friend, I couldn't agree more. The idea that there's more computing power in a graphing calculator than there was in the NASA computers is funny. It does indeed point to undisclosed tech, some of which we're using now.

ronisron wrote: Mrindigo wrote:




Those figures are for the guidance computer aboard the spacecraft. Actually calling the Apollo guidance system a computer is probably a bit of an exaggeration. It's more closely related to what we call a microcontroller today, or perhaps a digital autopilot. The number crunching was done at Mission Control on several mainframe computers that took up entire rooms. The results were transmitted to the Apollo guidance computer which acted on them. The onboard computer could only compute a small number of navigational problems itself but was capable of doing the task it was designed for.

Lunar Orbit wrote:
Like a PLC?

Well it seems that I am not in the mindset of being a believer of the Moon Landing hoax. There are so many clues you idiots and one for a fact is that the machinery to propell this vechile to The Moon was to be needed when the vechile returned back.
I am talking to idiots in this craphouse of a DiF wannabee forum

psketti wrote:
I think Kubrick filmed the first moon landing. Apparently there are the same light anomalies in the moon landing footage as there are in 2001 space oddysea (sp?) and he put them there deliberately so people would someday know the truth. His film 'eyes wide shut' was released 30 yrs to the day after the moon landing. there is other stuff but can't remember at the moment.

Do you realise that all the members you've responded to in here, bar one, are no longer posting here?

The strongest evidence IMHO is simply the laser distance reflector.
Yet its rarely brought up.

andyh wrote:
It is possible to set up arrays on the Moon using unmanned craft, the Soviet Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2 rovers did just that and so the hoax believers just hand wave that away.

Lunar Orbit wrote:
Not 3 reflectors all coinciding with and tested at the times of the apollo landings.

The two soviet ones were of smaller design and are also there, so the conspiracy lot would have to account for unmanned probes dropping all the lot in perfect position in both space and time. No doubt secret missions for it all

They can handwave all they like tbh, they could say friendly aliens put them there and still believe it.