wake_up_bomb wrote:
The problem is it all (or most) has to be paid for by the tax payer (ATM) and politicians who make the dissensions find it hard to justify the cost to people (voters) who have lost their jobs homes etc and people who say things like:

The new missions to the Moon (and some Apollo missions) and Mars were simply cancelled because a large percentage of the voting public had lost interest and think the money could be better spent on other things. This is why NASA and other space agencies are encouraging private enterprise which is really starting to take off, no pun intended lol.

If you keep bringing down the amount of disposable income of the electorate via taxation and outsourcing through globalisation and putting profits into fewer and fewer hands then thats what you can expect the electorate to think.

Yet why does that matter if the only ones who CAN be elected are running the show for the minority who lobby them in the first place anyway?

These are the very ones who end up getting the 'privatisation' of such stuff is it not? The very guys who run global corporations that pay fuck all taxes right while we pay for everything and bail out the cunts More for the in-crowd and less for us and thats no conspiracy theory at all....

The Moon Landings were something that never took place and anyway NASA knows for a fact that there are alien bases on the Moon, yet they are silent about it. Those landings looked too 'neat and tidy' to be done in that day and age, but I do not believe money or anything of that nature is the cause of why there is no Mars landing. The reason of no Mars Landing is way too basic and that is that humanity has never been into space at all and it would be a task that would be virtually impossible. As for those so-called Mars photos, they were taken in a remote area of the Sahara desert.
Read this man and see what he has to say about the Moon Landing in one of his paragraphs OK

www.spellsandmagic.com/Brainwashed_Sheep.html

GoldenSun wrote:
jesus christ lol.

/points at the ISS.

GoldenSun wrote:

Well it seems that I am not in the mindset of being a believer of the Moon Landing hoax. There are so many clues you idiots and one for a fact is that the machinery to propell this vechile to The Moon was to be needed when the vechile returned back.
I am talking to idiots in this craphouse of a DiF wannabee forum

www.spellsandmagic.com

GoldenSun wrote:
Didn't Miss Congeniality here have an account in the past under a different name, making her a known sock?

Looks legit ...

What has the business dealings of PuZuZu got to do with this topic. This is where this forum differs greatly from the Dif, the topics do not ever get led astray like it is doing here, and yeah the Moon Landiings EVER took place and I know that Neil Armstrong died with guilt in his heart, why, well I contact his spirit after his death OK

GoldenSun wrote:
You linked us to his site.

I linked everyone to his site because you all might learn something of intense value. Great isn't he and he has been in a UFO and found out all about the Moon Landings from himself. Hey have you people heard of Bill Kaysing, Bart Sibrel or anyone else? Watched the docudrama called Capricorn One.

GoldenSun wrote:
You can see the ISS with a pair of binoculars, its in space, ergo we have been to space.

GoldenSun wrote:
Here are a few ways this forum differs from DIF.

1) The Admin don't read the PMs

2) We are allowed to discuss and challenge any moderation.

3) Eternal Spirit and the Not-a-Nazis don't have the explicit support of the Admin (I_am)

4) Racism and bigotry are not encouraged and defended by mods.

5) We are not a forum that focuses on David Icke.

cont...

No-one got banned from here because they also posted on Dif.

No-one set out to make money from the 'traffic' on this site.

No-one here is likely to try to sting you megabuck$ to go look at Llamas.

Psketti doesn't pretend she doesn't participate in the forum.

The head honcho here is not composed of 99% vaginas.

No they didn't land on the moon, they actually landed in my back section, and even I can prove this is fake

My favourite little fact about the Apollo missions is that there was no dust on the LEM's feet after landing.

Plus look at any of the footage of any of the "moon landings". It's fake.

Has anyone read Dave McGowan's series called Wagging the Moondoggie?

andyh wrote:


This.

hugorune wrote:
Double this.

I think we have, but possibly much earlier than is let on. I think the televised stuff was a bit naff and obvious tbh...but then, most television is. You wouldn't want something like that going tits up live on TV eh? Laughing-stock of the world n all that...

Had we been there earlier and were we in posession of technology far superior than we were lead to believe at the time, a fake landing would seem like a pretty fair option.

I know it's a bit out there...even for me.

Ab Origine wrote:
Personally I do not think that NASA hawking obviously faked moon landing footage is enough of a reason to believe that Man made it to the moon at some other unspecified time.

I think the quote below by Lyndon Baines Johnson explains why NASA wanted so much cash, and why they did not want to tell too many people about it.


"Control of space means control of the world. From space, the masters of infinity would have the power to control the earth's weather, to cause drought and flood, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the gulf stream and change temperate climates to frigid. There is something more important than the ultimate weapon. And that's the ultimate position. The position of total control over the Earth that lies somewhere in outer space." -Senator LBJ, Majority leader, Democratic caucus, Statement on Status of Nation's Defense and Race for Space, January 7, 1958.

I wonder what happened to NASA's attempts at controlling the weather?