wooooah he takes a super long long time to transform. i bet he has arthritis

Believe it or not, that was the height of the show.

Still, better than Automan. maybe.

Hey, I-baster...you forgot to clear this one up for me...
Gilly wrote:

automan bridge the matrix. hes a super concsious sent from far away. possibly 4 dimensional. a thousand years ago we would think automan was magic. but hes not is he, he's manipulating reality. id like to have the ability to fold and shape it... but i think i need to be able to feel the sensation of 5 dimensions. if dmt had a fresh minty after taste i'd smoke it all day. it taste like rotten breath. you just feel it.
and thats how i think, im feeling a lot of stuff. im like an octopus, scooting around. i thought things maybe nobody has ever thought of before. what if i do that..... a unique thought about something. nobody ever thought of it ever, you just discovered that. its like walking on the moon right, but your mind is the moon and your memories are footprints. sometimes you look from outerspace at your memories on a lifeless rock. i dont know what life is. what separates things, where is the line drawn?

batou wrote:
From what i have heard about DMT, it is best to let go of dualities.

Gilly wrote:

I think you have to pay me if I am going to trawl through the forum constructing evidence for this little assignment of yours. It serves no purpose especially when we all know what your response will be after that. You call me names then say shit like kindly? You crack me up.

Fox pulls Family Guy episode

www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/04/16...-to/?intcmp=trending

i-baster wrote:
Well done for proving that you dodge questions. It's hardly 'my little assignment' asking you to back up your own derogatory comments about people here. If you think some members behave as per your accusation, surely you can say who they are and why you make such a claim, without having to trawl through the forum! If not, you really shouldn't be saying these things - then pretending you've been 'misunderstood', which is usually your next move.
.

i heard iobama sent some riacin to himself today :rolleyes: @package grab @insidejob

Boston Bombing Culprits Found?
April 17, 2013

www.blacklistednews.com/Boston_Bombing_C...399/0/38/38/Y/M.html

I hope the people in these pictures can be located and questioned. There's nothing conclusive, so far as I can see (hence the question mark in the title) but where pictures show someone with a backpack, and later, standing at the route without their backpack, it needs following up.

There is a difference between a question and a request. I don't have to do everything you ask. I can answer questions or decide not to. This topic is regarding bombs in Boston. I do not wish to turn it into a childish debate over a comment I made. I said what I think is the balance of this forum and how some people approach conspiracy in a certain way. I do not wish to name Names. It is clear to me and if you don't see it that is fine with me. You think I didn't answer but I say I have answered plenty. You don't like my answers then don't ask me questions.

That website is a little dodgy in my view Gilly. I don't think racial profiling is cool. Why is he a suspect? Black bag and
Brown skin? Seriously?

i-baster wrote:
No, you talked yourself into a corner with your derogatory comments about people, because you're not very bright, but when pushed to back up your accusations, you refused to answer, which is par for the course, even though you took offence when WUB pointed out to you that you evade. Learn not to make derisive remarks about people if you don't want to be called out on it.

Back to the topic...

(CNN) -- [Breaking news update at 1:47 p.m. Wednesday ]
An arrest has been made in the Boston bombings investigation based on two videos showing images of the suspect, a federal law enforcement source told CNN's Fran Townsend.

edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html

That's it in its entirity - no further details given.

*Edit* I thought the 'brown skin' comment was odd, frankly, especially since at least one of the men repeatedly shown looked white to my eyes. However, I'm not sure that it was the skin colour that was supposed to be relevant, other than as a reason he thought it was one of the same men shown in later pictures. Not sure.

I think it's the behaviour of those people - i.e. not appearing to be watching the race, & carrying big bags, at least one of which did look like the contents was possibly pressure cooker shape & dimensions - then later, in 1 instance, without the bag - that might be relevant. Might be innocent, too, but certainly worth locating and speaking to I think.

Gilly wrote:

Here we go again! For anybody who's actually interested rather than playing games, there are a lot more photo's on that link. Or maybe we should take the view that it's foolish to consider any bastard did this? The bombs planted themselves, perhaps.

i think those guys are involved, possibly anti terrorist police, they look professional, they're standing around the area the bombs went off, this is an interesting photo imo:

I was questioning the reliability of a racist website. That is odd to you but racist to me. Lots of people would have black bags there so to publish these images on the internet highlighting the one man's skin colour appears dishonest. Obviously the FBI will be Looking for those responsible. I didn't suggest otherwise. Unless the marathon runners etc were all actors.

i-baster wrote:
I didn't see anything racist said, but I see in your feeble determination to disagree and cast aspersions (what a surprise), you've ignored the bulk of my response to your initial comment. There's nothing to suggest that his colour had any bearing on whether he was being viewed as being suspicious. That's why I thought it was odd to point it out - unless it was maybe a marker, in the same way that 'compartment' & so on on the bags was noted, to show that he was thought to be the same person showed in other pictures from different angles where his features weren't clear.
i-baster wrote:
You must be deliberately missing the point - bags that fitted the bill for carrying pressure cookers - then no bags - then exploding devices manufactured from pressure cookers.
i-baster wrote:
Not to mention downright daft, IF the comment had actually been motivated by racism, since many of the photo's were of white men.
i-baster wrote:
Who said they weren't? Who said you did?
i-baster wrote:
Stupid git!

Mike wrote:
Interesting choice of shoes and pants