dubmeup wrote:
The only argument I could agree with to any extent was they need guns to protect them against a tyrannical government, unfortunately history has shown they don't use them for this!

mushy wrote:
You're doing whats called projecting mushy.
That is bs.

I never said just anti-gun folk are fat idiots.
Millions of Americans are indeed overweight and ignorant, its a well known fact, it's why things are so fucked up. (this includes both the pro and the anti gun crowd)
The food most of us get is laced with carbs and God knows what else, its hardly surprising people end up fat and the education they get over there is laughable...
The Swiss are indeed armed to the teeth and yet have lower gun crime than the UK.
They are well educated, healthier and don't have a govt that sticks its nose where it doesn't belong.
They have direct democracy and low crime basically because they're not stupid. Its really obvious when you look at it.

oioioi wrote:
Well again that just backs everything up about most of em being as thick as two short planks on end...

andyh wrote:
im not projecting andyh thats something i could ezplain to you but i digress ,
indeed you did and above you admit it said anti gun people are fat idiots previously you called them fat fucks and now your further on the defensive going on about the general diet of meeicans and food additives ,
lol cmon wtf eh .

andyh wrote:
well it might had you not said it was the anti crowd that were stupid fat fucks ,
have you now changed your mind and decided the pro gin crowd are thickos ?
perhaps they all are lol

oioioi wrote:
i dont think theres ever been a case recorded were they have ,
only thing i can think of is an almost childlike
fantasy of heroes with guns and gangsters
live by the sword die by the sword

sportsman aside of course nowt wrong with that as far as i make out but hey ?

btw nowt wrong with.carbs slow energy release is vital all protien and fat would make grumpy hungry people even veggies get a carb intake
the provlem is fats that are hard to digest and too much protien the additives in most foods are natural actually but theres no good meat n tatties stoey in that so we lump em all together good and bad
another bad aciwnce feom conspiracy theorists

aint corn syrup a huge factor in obesity in the USA?

mushy wrote:
No I did not specifically state that only anti-gun people are fat fucks.
If you could point out where I specifically said that it'd be great.

The only one on the defensive is yourself because you have realised you have tripped up in stating quite clearly that you have no interest in freedom on a forum where we discuss that mainly

mushy wrote:
Carbs cause the body to produce insulin and it is actually insulin which actually helps traps fat in the body.
You would know this if you dropped the new textbooks and take a quick look at the old ones incl stuff like the atkins diet etc.

Basically if you turn the clock back a century or two our diets did not have processed food, very little in the way of cereals other than oats and perhaps bread, certainly no sweets,crisps and MSG's galore.
Surely you understand that it is possible for people to be fat and yet eat surprisingly little and vice versa?
This whole idea that fat is a result of merely eating too much is weak.
Theres a video on the sites mediazone that explains everything.

Thats why i mentioned corn syrup andy. Ms dubs tells me that you dont need to overeat as such to get fat if it's in all your food. Well according to what she has read anyway

dubmeup wrote:
Yessir we love us a mess of sir up on our big stack of hillbilly boy panercakes, texan speak, emmm yummmm

It's in loads of stuff aint it Rick? Like even stuff you wouldn't imagine?

dubmeup wrote:
Yuppers

Now why would a responsible food producer go lacing stuff with summat that makes you fat on sight?

dubmeup wrote:
Because the poor can't afford the high dollar natural stuff,mass feeding of the poor and uneducated people.

Are you suggesting that this toxic crap is being targetted at.....um......poor people????

Who would do such a heinous thing?

dubmeup wrote:
This post of yours reminded me of a commercial we've seen on TV.. lemme see if there's a Youtube version of it.

Well, I couldn't find one, but I did find this article:

abcnews.go.com/Business/corn-syrup-versu...rt/story?id=15969618

Anyway, in this ad campaign, some actor says stuff like: "Sugar is sugar" as in, your body can't tell the fucking difference ... damn propaganda, lol.

dubmeup wrote:
It's economics purely I consume corn sugar products,I think in moderation there fine,but it's a studied fact poor people are the main overweight group in the USA,that is their enjoyment in life to eat junk food high in sugar and fat

It's similar in Britain Rick. I'm not sure it's a case of poor people getting off on shite food, just as you say, the poorer you are the less 'good' food you can get.

Like over here for example, organic food is considered a premium product. In the supermarkets it's sold at a much higher price.
A much higher mark up than can be justified by extra labour costs etc. So the simpler,more natural stuff tends to be bought by people with a higher 'disposable' income whilst the poor are forced to eat the shit equivalent.