andyh wrote:
Gotta agree with this.

psketti wrote:
people made guns ,
mchine guns automatic pistols sniper rifles
yeah all prety harmless stuff self built for cosmetic purposes .
or for people to protect themselves fro other people thinkinkg the same thing no doubt ,

half truths mis information and diwt tips to boot
lol what next protien causea cancer but a joint cures it so have a toke with your next burger lol
......
carbs are vital without them we would all be grumpy diabetics
obeity was made worse by turning food into a hobby and stupid diets
obese people are in a metabolic catch 22 until calorie consumption.equalisiea .ita n

That has already been proven to a total fallacy.
mushy wrote:
And here you are spewing out yet more nonsense.

Knives kill people, so how about banning them and only allowing the production of plastic spoons for the safety of the children?

Explain the occurrence of obesity in populations with poor nutrition? Calories In Calories Out has been shown to be a flawed notion in numerous studies.

There is plenty of supporting evidence that cannabis oil cures cancer.

Disarming the population is a political objective and MSM is a political tool which promotes the policies of government. The fact is the population in the USA don't share the view of their government or media on that issue, despite what the news and documentaries try to claim. That fact was clear in the data provided earlier in the thread.

I think that it really doesn't matter what weapons there are; as long as the human race is the way it is, they will keep killing one another, be it with guns, knives, clubs, stones or just their bare hands.

So personally i see no point in banning anything. And yes, i know that guns kill more people in a quicker manner than the other examples cited above; fact remains, if all weapons were banned, the killing would still go on - it's the nature of this particular beast at this particular point in time.

mushy wrote:
All food is vital, just not processed crap.

Perhaps we should just ban the human race and be done with it mushy?

andyh wrote:
were do you draw the line processed or refined sugar
salt curing ,
your at it again you blamed carbs which was nonsense
theres different types of carbs short term and long term

they are essential.its not a case of banning all foods which is something that avoiding carbs would almost do .
most common and frequentley used car would be a famous glucose health sports drink in fact all gclucose
sports drinks because glucpse is a carb

its a case of realising that unless youve just burned
4000 calories you dont need a huge salad sandwich
and glucose drink which combined would almost certainly contain treble the amount you need

a can of coke and sandwich would be fine or glucose drink on its own with some protien .

the processed myth is that it means un naturally occuring products , it doesnt only a tiny part of procedded fooss are dodgy and they are fats like trans fats which body just cannot process .

mushy wrote:


Watch and learn, skip to 4 mins in to kick off though. There is more to getting fat than just calories.

andyh wrote:
wait till i tell the guys in the cycle club im getting told about nutrition ,
they will have a fit ,
theres more to being fat than calories lol
what was it you said carbs are bad food of old was good additives are evil ,
now your cutting n pasting videos .

"somebody on the internet is telling me about nutrition"
lol

psketti wrote:
guns are built by people ,
machine guns , automatic pistols , sniper rifles etc ,

lets apply that logic ( guns dont kill people do ) to other weapons made by man that are inert without mans intervention ,
the landmine now looked upon as an assisted suicide device or the high altitude bomb or death lottery device

no guns kill people the art of perfecting this has led to used uranium bullets and rapid fire systems right down to cleverly concealed guns .

i think if i put a land mind outside and it blows someones foot off, im to blame, not the landmine.

batou wrote: lmfao

mushy wrote:
Well you're the one who wants to ban 'em.
Ban guns, ban knives, ban baseball bats, ban batons, ban ban ban ban
Warning may contain nuts...

mushy wrote:
Will the NYT do?
www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/magazine/what...agewanted=all&src=pm

or this..

science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/...iology/fat-cell2.htm

Pum pum PUMMMMM!
Shock horror, in plain scientific view all along.

Yes it's the people, not the guns who are sometimes nutters. But nutters & people of a Rambo mentality should surely not be allowed to have guns. And if it wasn't common-place for nutters to have guns, police forces in countries like America wouldn't have such a gung-ho shoot to kill policy perhaps.

And I'm certainly not sure Batou should be allowed to have a land-mine.

Gilly wrote:
Its OK for the police to have guns ofc and its expected for criminals to have guns.
The sheeple are just there to be shot at.

But would police need to be armed to the teeth in say the States if the people on the street weren't armed up? Police in the UK are usually unarmed. (Except, increasingly, with tasers, but that's another matter).

Gilly wrote:
More so now, to protect us from terrywrists like brazilian electricians and all that.
Then there's those 'gangs' with guns ofc...

Again it harks back to the question, why are the US and the UK such violent places in the 1st place?
www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_ass_vic-crime-assault-victims

Thats scary to be honest...fair enough thats only relevant to compare developed countries such as EU/US/Oz etc but it never fails to raise a few eyebrows.

andyh wrote:
i detect a bit of back peddling ,
do these reports back up your claim that carbs are bad or my claim that they are essential and without them we would be grumpy diabetics

i repeat i know this shit inside out im not out to prove a point save face or something lame ,
i repeat i cycle run and trek into the hills
diet and nutrition are part of the course
ive shared the road with obree hoy armstrong
and had training advice from guys who trained
olympic class riders
so keep going its hillarious to see your posts adapt the more you google .

andyh wrote:


Gilly wrote:
Way things are heading, I expect this won't be the case for much longer unfortunately.