Darkmoon wrote:
No one has anything against revisionism (I took sides on the gas chambers issue against Dogsmilk last year too); and no one is calling anyone a Neo-Nazi for being a revisionist or for saying it was not 6 million Jews (they were probably not 6 million Jews, that's just the highest figure given by historians; which ranges between 3 or 4 million and 6 million).

I call a Neo-Nazi someone who defends or expresses their support for Nazism or Hitler; or who always takes sides with those who do. That's what happens to be a Neo-Nazi; I'm not the one who came up with that definition.

dogsmilk wrote:
If he is resistance, he's totally one of them... not because of the "Political Correctness" thread (that thread only shows he is a right-wing extremist) but, as you well said, because of the comments he made on other threads regarding issues related with Nazism and above all anti-Semitism. He is obviously not a Gonzo, a Jimmy or a Bjornyvan, but just another little Neo-Nazi wannabe like Zephirod with an added far right-wing twist; who hangs around those types of threads to join in against anyone who challenges their hateful and vicious lies.

Darkmoon wrote:
I forget exactly what you said, but it was something about how Hitler did great things for Germany or something. You obviously thought you'd gone to far because you swiftly deleted it. I guess you'll fall back to your default claim you only think Volkswagons are great. And it wasn't tongue in cheek. You can backtrack all you like, but IIRC I gave you a second example. Unfortunately I'm suspended again and can't use the search function - not fort breaching any rules but for contradicting groupthink. If only I stuck to posting antisemitic diatribes - Sean would have had no problem with that would he?

Your 'political correctness' thing is hollow words. For you it's a means of attempting to head off criticism of the kind of bigotry you promote. For example this by your namesake -
www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/06/po...and-sexual-deviancy/
people can make up their own minds about it. And the publication it appeared in - the 'respectable' outlet for the American racist far right.
This is what you were promoting on the DIF and felt motivated to start a thread about saying how great it was - then of course flatly refusing to define exactly what your chosen parameters of 'sexual deviance' are. Because let's face it - we all know that includes e.g. gay people. You just haven't got the balls to defend your views. Like with someone like Hadaka Jimmy, at least that guy stands up for what he believes in. He may be fucked up, but he's honest about who is and what he stands for. I don't respect him but I can respect that. Same with rodin - he doesn't beat around the bush. He's honest about his opinions. You, however, are devious. You carp on about free speech, yet you cheer when people whose views you don't like are censored. You claim to be against political correctness, yet call for a political correctness about not being able to call a bigot a bigot.

And you clearly don't know much about anarchism. But my experience is you don't know much about anything.
Most anarchists are militantly anti-facist/racist/etc - you did know that, right? Ok you do get that weird national anarchism, but hardly anyone has even heard of those guys.

Oh and I've previously explained to people why I call myself dogsmilk. I have nothing to hide.
This is where yours comes from
www.darkmoon.me/2012/how-the-jews-took-over-america/
Why you seem to idolise this daft cow I really cannot fathom.

Oh and sure I've said I've taken the piss with people and said why - and? If I take the piss, I admit it. If I'm flaming or trolling (as oposed to just being accused of it when IU don't think I am), I'll admit it. I'm not the only person to lapse into flaming or trolling - probably at least half of posters do at one time or another. I'm not going to deny my behaviour when it occurs. You should try it sometime (being honest) - you might find it liberating.

Steevo wrote:
I know for a fact this is already happening; and they are absolutely right, the DIF is practically Stormfront with conspiracy theories and esoteric stuff.

One example: Someone just signed on the other day, and their first post in general about the forum was something like: I agree with all you say about the Zionism and the Jews, but I just can't believe the stuff about the reptilians.

Another example is one offered from another new forum member who told his friend he was joining the DIF, to which his friend answered something like: what the hell do you have in common with those Nazis?

This is what the people who run the forum want (thought they don't want it be openly known); DI always had many Neo-Nazi followers, and I guess this is a market he doesn't want to loose. That's why Neo-Nazis get all that support from the mods, and why the anti-Nazi mods where kicked out.

Flyermay wrote:
Actually, on the sexual deviance thread, resistance kept launching personal attacks against me, then started accusing me of launching personal attacks against him. The think is, these guys have a totalitarian mindset - if you support this totalitarian bullshit you obviously tend to percieve yourself as the potential Fuhrer. That's what all this 'political correctness' stuff is really about - it's about wanting a new form of political correctness where it's political incorrect to call a racist a racist or an antisemite an antisemite. It's a sort of mirror political correctness from an evil dimension they want instead.

Round and round we go...

It's just like the good old days on the DIF.

I mostly stayed out of it though, barring the odd post here and there.
The only other post I made in this thread I complained about someone being silenced in a free speech thread, which I found ironic.

It bores me senseless all this nazi/anarchist/communist/jewish shite. Pin your badges to your shirts and jump on the merry go round. Rather you than me

irrepressible wrote:
I didn't see communists come into it yet although guevarista's not got started yet :p

andyh wrote:
I sort of consider myself an anarchist communist if that's any help...?

Obviously not a fan of the Bolsheviks, but maybe this will get us in the mood



You have to admit it's catchy.

Did that do the trick comrade?

dogsmilk wrote:
They all do it; they all follow the exact same pattern. You either agree with them, or you deserve to be attacked; they all lie all the time, and most had been caught doing so many times; and they are all a bunch of hypocrites, they keep on asking for things that they are not willing to comply with.

But the worst part is their deceitfulness. They are always trying to see how far they can go in their claims: if people are fine with them, they go ahead; and if they see too many people opposes them, then they go back on their claims a few steps... that's where all this stuff about "now I'm a Neo-Nazi and an anti-Semite... now I'm not" comes from. They stand for it, and they certainly share the same believes and behavior, but openly admitting it would turn too many people off... and I'm staring to think the DIF is on the same page (after how they are supporting and backing them up).

dogsmilk wrote:
lol
I'm more of an anarcho-syndicalist/post scarcity anarchist :p
I love the complexity and all that

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Scarcity_Anarchism

dogsmilk wrote:

Frog wrote:
Give a straight answer and there's no need for insinuation; 6 million Jews didn't die in WWII, now what?

Flyermay wrote:
As I've said over there before I vdon't get why people don't do the Soviets. Hitler, Hitler, Hitler. Why no people supporting uncle Joe?
I still maintain as a comparable homicidal dictator, Stalin was way cooler than Hitler. If I was going to back any homicidal totalitarian dictator, it would be uncle Joe. If only because of the moustache and pipe.

andyh wrote:
I don't percieve much difference between the two.

dogsmilk wrote:
Yes, and the hoax is far greater... 4 to 6 million; that's nothing. The hoax on Stalin was 8 to a staggering 60 million.

Holohoax!!!!!

When will these realise?

dogsmilk wrote:
I've yet to see conclusive proof Stalin killed 20 million...and I hear he liked animals.

dogsmilk wrote:
Hi Dogsmilk

I agreee with all you just said there (except the bit where you say stormfront see DIF as a potential recruiting zone). I think that DIF is not a good place to find Nazi sympathisers really.

Someone needs to write a 'diftionary' to help new members understand what posters are on about - I shall start of

Disruptive poster = someone who picks up a point from a post that the person who said it does not want to have to qualify - usually because they cannot without appearing to be what they are being called out as

Hasbara Troll = someone who disagrees with what is being said and has the temerity to voice it - used mainly against those who have spoken out about anti semitism (the non dif version)

Anti semitic = someone who is hateful towards arabs

Free speech = anything the person who utters the words think should be allowed to be talked about no more no less

Race realist = racist

Politically correct = anything that involves showing respect for others by moderating yourself

Troll = someone who disagrees with other posters

Hitler = good guy liked animals

Jew = anyone who has ever eaten a pretzel been seen near a pretzel or had a great grandmother who liked pretzels - also includes anyone who has 'money' or 'power' definitely not a race though in many cases the only way in which to associate an individual with being jewish is through the use of racial indicators - repeat this does not make them a race therefore hateful posts are not racist - likely to be a neandarthal

Communist - Jew

Bolshevik - jew

Holocaust - jewish lie

Nuclear bombs - jewish lie

Homosexuality - doesnt really exist in that it is the fault of jewish medias attempt to break up the family - people only 'believe' they are gay due to 'brainwashing'

Queen Elizabeth - richest lizard in the known universe

Prince William - jew

Paul mccartney - dead

Women - inferior members of the species who should never have left the kitchen - rather simple therefore easily brainwashed into having to act and dress a certain way in order to make themselves more attractive to men - something went wrong with the programming though so the specifications have gone awry new sets of specifications are constantly being worked out

David Icke - He who shall not be put under the same scrutiny as those he makes claims about - all round philanthropist - working only to help get information out - often faced with court cases - needs your money

oioioi wrote:
They say he killed all those Poles, but that is heavily based on so-called "eyewitnesses" and we know they were shot with German ammunition - definite hoax. And it's illegal to deny he did all that stuff he supposedly did in several countries - what have they got to hide?
So a few people went hungry in Ukraine - that was just some kulaks exaggerating a famine. I mean - they claim people were eating their children, but there is absolutely no forensic evidence this ever occurred. And why haven't all the mass graves been opened because I demand it? Because they're empty, that's why. Where is the PROOF Stalin killed millions of people?

Uncle Joe dragged a backwards agrarian country into being the world's second superpower where everybody had a job. Ok he didn't have Volkswagons, but he had the T34 which pretty much everybody agrees was the best all round tank of the second world war. Yet growing up I was constantly subjected to vicious propaganda like Top Gun, Rambo and Red Dawn - this was an effort by the NWO to demonise the one power cabable of standing up to them. Think about it - have you ever seen the MSM say the collapse of the Soviet Union was anything other than a good thing????

dogsmilk wrote:
Between anarcho-communism and post scarcity? Massive difference tbh.
Thats my own perception though.