Space Bandit wrote:
Mike wrote:
Gilly wrote:
You're seriously comparing Primark shoppers to the likes of Hitler in terms of being murderers???
Then I can no longer take seriously a single word you say.
Actually I think they're worse, what Hitler was trying would have benefited lot's of people, only Germans but still, consumers think only about themselves, their own private interests, their lives benefit nobody just further extend the profits of multi-national corporations and maintain the status quo with passive violence which has effects all over the world every day.
So people shop at the cheapest shops because they're skint so it's their fault?
If Hitler or Stalin did things that helped a lot of people they did it at the expense of millions of innocent people who died.
The two things are clearly incomparable.
No they just consume, they don't create nobody knows how to make clothes so they shop at exploitative multi nationals because it's cheaper to look like some prick off the telly that way, they don't think ethically, they buy "High street fashion" that looks like designer but is way cheaper because it's made by kids in sweatshops
It's sod all to do with ethics people who are skint will spend their money as frugally as they can.
There are all sorts of ethical dilemmas behind so many products do you know all of them?
Do you find that you are forced to forgo ethics when you're skint?
They moan about immigrants and benefits scroungers
This is getting into sweeping generalisation after a few drinks mode...
Who are these supposedly innocent people Stalin was supposed to have murdered?
He never had anything like the Holocaust going on, the two people are clearly only compared to each other by utterly banal noobs.
Actually, I just Googled it & it turns out you're right.
Both blokes were good, local blokes wanting the best for local folk. Sorry for my newbie talk there.
