mikey mikey wrote:
mikey

if you look at 90% of my posts they are littered with humour

is the banhammer commin

i think oi does what he does on this site because he wants to , i'd be very surprised if he wants everyone to fall to their knees and give him 10 salami's

STOP THE BUS !

We have all had a good giggle at D Icke asking for money eh?

well here's something , I was asked to donate here ? eh eh eh eh ?

but i'm sure that was humour ?

atlantean wrote:

and by the way , where did i insult oi ?

I am thinking that Scal was trying to say "anybody from X to Y "X being cunts and Y being good guys.

Maybe cos I like oi and Pope Francis

Or cos I like scal

Either way, probably a crossed wire+ me being over-protective after our 2 years of scrapping

I'd just like to see them explain
A: Why they need an expensive studio in one of the most expensive cities on Earth ?
B: £20K +£5/6k actual cost of studio set up-£140k declared?

Well, for starters anyway

scaltura wrote: Tbf to you, even though you're a cunt I don't think you did. It's not how I read it anyway.

scaltura wrote:
Yeah sorry. It just read "Cameron, Icke, oi" and I thought WTF


I tend to be over-defensive

PT-DIF-D

scaltura wrote:
I don't have one.

Boys!

pssssssst mikey

oi can look after himself

you'll make his wife jealous

I wonder if all this 'sniffing Charlie' is why Russell Brand appears to have given TPV a wide birth after previously announcing his willingness to be involved ?

Blue_Tackler wrote: berth.

scaltura wrote:

scaltura wrote:
Ii really don't care what she takes, none of my business. BTW Ellisa Hawke was on a 6 month holiday visa from last July so she had no option to leave the country.

See, I was about follow Phem's example of attempting distract to calm you gentlemen down - post a picture of an 'epic prow' - but there's no need to now, so you can pig off & find your own pornography.

Absolutely legendary thread. Haven't been in front of my pc for a few days, but been following it on my android, and I've been wetting my y-fronts with some of the posts.

Still on my phone and can't really be arsed to type out a massive response, but do carry on

mikey mikey wrote:




This is better

TBH I don't really care for all the tittle tattle at the end of the day , what started me rolling in the thread in the past few pages is where you said there may be info coming out in the next few days .

what i'm sayin is , basically

put up or shut up

but i'm not the 1st to say that to ya , am i

atlantean wrote: Sounds like an ideal, well thought through, selection for a presenters gig to me.

feather wrote:
Yep absolutely no possible reason to suspect it was all designed to go tits up from the very beginning by Sean and Icke with key presenters like that