Goldenprince13 wrote:
The fact you posted about reporting him over just making a living ignores the evidence in my opinion....
Ok, you insist on carrying on with yer strawman.
Show me the quote of me saying I think he is just making a living. What I said was, I am not against him making a living. I'm not against
anyone making a living. Why? Are You?
...of what has been posted over seeking to incite a response, and also make it sound like reporting that is somehow bad for reporting someone you feel is not 'big' enough, but in you're next post actually prove he is big enough for you as you have already reported him to organizations yourself ??
You got a bit tied up with yer words there innit. But I think I can just about decipher the jist of it.
I consider grassing people up to be pretty low myself. As I said, you'd have to be pretty rotten for me to do it. Unlike Icke, I don't go crying to the authorities...I would indeed consider grassing Icke to HMRC to be the act of a total wanker (unless as Gilly pointed out, Icke grew some and went on the legal attack). But that's just me.
As I said though. Grassing Hague for terrorism for example, is a different matter. That's just the act of a righteous lunatic.
Do you remember I said the word, scale?
Yes, Icke registers on my cunt response scale. Just about at the level of various anti bigot organizations....So contacting them was a just thing to do as far as I'm concerned. It makes no odds to me if someone else wants to judge that action. I am at peace with it already.
The idea is to 'share' info & build a dossier of evidence in my opinion, as put all of it together then you have a much bigger picture, but that has been ignored instead we have the strawman being employed to dismiss the fact that you think it was to do with icke 'making a living' ....
Again, show me the quote of me saying tpv and Icke's alleged tax evasion is just Icke making a living or admit that
you have created the strawman here. To help you out. My opinion is that TPV is borderline criminal at best. It is certainly a corrupt Icke cash cow. My opinion is that Icke himself is borderline criminal at best. I despise the way he has exploited and does exploit numerous pilfered truths, which due to his pea brain, he then contaminates to build an 'empire' of new age guru claptrap. I think whether he knows it or not, he is controlling the opposition, to coin a phrase. I love him as a human creation and loathe him as a man. Why the fuck would you be building a strawman based on me "defending him"?
I don't need to explain it to you here. My views on Icke are
strewn across this forum for all to see.
...that someone could claim donations whilst claiming to be skint, that same someone has as this thread shows, gone against the very principles he espouses, and again gleaned donations for a enterprise that he could have funded himself shows in many ways how this 'living' is being made....
I absolutely agree with this bit. Icke is making a living out of being a wanker. That much is clear. Out of all the things he could do to make a living, he chose to be a wanker. What a wanker. Are you getting me yet?
And again there is a issue of where the donations have gone, just like his legal fund donations....that is what this is about, i personally would rather accumulate a full dossier no matter how long it takes, but others just as with the indiegogo complaints lodged, would rather report what they find and take it step by step...that is each individuals choice as i see it, and posting such things dub seems "awry" to me when you yourself have already done it, yet are telling others he is not big enough, and it is somehow wrong, yet do not take into account you have already done it yourself ???
I really do agree with a lot of what you say there but again, you are referring to your strawman in taking issue with what I have said.
I am all for folk doing what they deem righteous and just with wankers. It is up for others to decide where Icke sits on
their scale. I decided he sits at the snivelling little cunt level for me. So I acted at an appropriate level of compromising my own principles.
Cue mega rant thread on compromising your principles
The evidence i posted speaks for itself and this is not something that requires much research, of someone who claims freedom,love and wants others donations to set them free, it shows a pattern and he has not stopped gleaning donations since, he makes his 'living' from parasitism and claims to have no money yet plenty are just pointing out, that is not the case....
Spot on. Totally agree
So i shall continue doing what i do, and if you object then that is your choice, it is also mine and others to decide if they seek to report that information, and seeing as you have already reported icke, maybe in the light of the morning you may see why i do not understand why you chose to post that comment at all...for what it is based on ??
Where did I object to anything you've done other than your creation of a strawman for me?
Though I
would object if you stated your intention to grass him to HMRC . I think I've been clear. Grassing him to the HMRC would
imo be a highly disproportionate thing to do in response to Icke's level of cuntery. It would in fact cause one to register on my cunt scale.
But you haven't stated that have you and I don't think I've seen you encourage anyone else to do it either. So take your strawman back and as far as I'm concerned, we cool
