3point5 wrote:
omfg this should be TPV's new facebook cover pic hahahahahaha

crazybeats wrote: I believe in evil bankers.

dubmeup wrote: I knew he'd turn out to be a fucking idiot, I'm glad I didn't waste my time paying any attention to him. What a surprise...he has turned out to be a fucking idiot. Who would have thought based on his appearance that he would have turned out to be a bit of a bigot? I’m flabbergasted.

Yeah, we want everyone to be free, we're tired of oppression and being dictated to. But we should dictate to others what their consensual sexual practices are. But it's all because it's part of an evil agenda to normalise homosexuality and break up the family (which it could be argued is in itself an unnatural, atomised state anyway, and the value of which was only emphasised orginally precisely to break down the idea that people should be communally minded). And give nonces a free regin. Because there's an obvious link between homosexuality and sexual abuse, as proved by all of the straight people guilty of sexual offences, including paedophilia, and all of the homosexuals who never commit any offences of any nature.

Of course, for centuries homosexuality was completely illegal and ruthlessly clamped down on, for example Oscar Wilde famously died essentially as a direct result of his sexual conduct. At which time TPTB hadn’t worked out that promoting the homosexual agenda would be so effective in their dastardly plans. Today, of course, the evil fuckers have decided to try to make everyone in the world gay by giving people the legal right to decide who they have consensual sex with. Except in all the other countries where it’s still illegal, and the ones where it’s punishable by death.

This really begs the questions, who’s got it right? Is it the countries that stone people to death for being gay, thus putting an end to the evil homosexual agenda, but do other things that we disagree with? Or is it those countries that do many evil things, but allow adults’ consensual sex lives to be a relatively private matter (no-one has true privacy in this age, obviously)?

People wonder why the ‘truth movement’ doesn’t getting taken fucking seriously...maybe it’s because people involved have rightly recognised that the existing world is extremely corrupt, but can’t actually come up with a consistent idea about anything themselves and make all kinds of unwise and unfounded generalisations which don’t remotely work out in reality.

You know what the worst thing is about these people? Its that in some respect they're right.

Sexuality is being used as a tool of division, just not in the way that they think. As such, nothing is being done to tackle the real problem, and that's "the label". The want of a label these days (gay, straight, thin, fat, black, white, Christian, Muslim) is what divides us. The more we are divided, the more labels are invented, and round and round we go separating ourselves until one day we won't identify with anyone, we won't band together with our brothers and sisters.

Family means less and less these days and its got sod all to do with sexuality and a shitload to do with selfishness, lack of empathy, and the promotion of things that just don't matter.

electricdreams wrote:
+1 its barmy how nobody is calling TPV out on the fact that it was not supposed to be Gareth Ickes personal toy used to further his music career. He's a goon

SilvaRizla wrote: To some extent I would agree with you, but I think in the case of sexuality homosexuals don't want to be recognised as homosexuals first and foremost and don't identify themselves that way. They just want to be seen as 'normal' people and lead a 'normal' life. It's only because they will be subjected to inevitable prejudice in large parts of the country, and indeed world, that there is any such entity as a 'homosexual community'.

I mean, where I come from, you are going to have a very hard time if you are openly gay. It may have got slightly better since I was an adolescent, although I doubt that it's got that much better, but just school for example would be a total nightmare. The potential for prejudice, abuse and even violence would constantly stalk you. No wonder these people don't really feel 'part of the community'.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
I think you're right, but I also think that its fairly evident that in the MSM the "push" as it were is more on your vocal G.A.P type homosexual. "If you're gay, this is how you should be" type stuff. Take TV for example, Graham Norton and Alan Carr did very well promoting the overly camp gay man (imo of course) to the extent where I began to notice it in the street. It seemed like you couldn't just be gay, everyone around you must know it. I think the reasoning behind it is very self explanatory and unfortunately I see it as sort of manufactured homosexual. A definite agenda being pushed. Know what I mean?

Its just my opinion and I'm not sure whether its an accurate one or local anomaly, but I did notice this social change.

We're still relatively new in sexuality acceptance as a society don't forget, so at them moment many homosexuals may not want that label as a huge identifier, but I see things being quite different in 100 years.

Hopefully I'm wrong

TPV Facebook, is this Jaymie Icke that authors this
Seems to be similar to Dave's site and books, i.e. all copy, pasted and stolen from other sources.
Where are the TPV journo's, surely there must be some ?
After all where's the 50k a month in wages going

Figures from latest beging bowl:
£18,171GBP
raised of £50,000 goal

Looks like Richie may have to buy a tent soon.

I wonder if the Wembley office is open at weekends? Maybe I could make a little day trip with my camera?

SilvaRizla wrote:
I have read some stuff about this, and I can to some extent appreciate where this is coming from. In my opinion, if you’re looking at the basic popular culture, particularly advertising and commerce, then this isn’t the most obvious or damaging trend. It’s hard for me to comment too much on the urban or popular culture, because I think cities are completely unhealthy and the popular culture completely odious, but as someone who grew up in a place that was utterly bigoted in virtually every respect, the idea of seeing a few camp people around doesn’t bother me in the slightest. If anything, it just means more women for me (theoretically, although I’m sure it wouldn’t work out that way in practice!)

I would say that we haven’t at all reached the point of sexuality acceptance. To some extent, homosexuality is tolerated, but a lot of people to a greater or lesser extent – I would assert that it’s mostly men – find homosexuality distasteful, although of course no-one objects to sexy women getting off with each other! If you notice even with the rabid Phelps family, all of the emphasis is constantly on 'fags'; they never talk about lesbians at all.

For me it’s just a pointless and fatuous hang-up, and there is no basis whatsoever to suppose that there is an underlying agenda to encourage or even brainwash people into being homosexual. The consensual sexual conduct of an individual above the age of consent should be his or her own business, and no business of the state. I find it incredible to see people who are supposedly against the NWO arguing otherwise (I don’t mean yourself).

instagram.com/zakisolosho

there's a pic of gareth icke on this which sums the muppet up

Lunar Sea wrote:
I don't know but I'd bet Daisy is responsible for the FB pages for the new companies Ickonic Ads and Volcanica. It's all the same style and Daisy is the IT expert

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Sorry I should of clarified, I meant sexuality acceptance is a new and on going process in its early stages, far from complete.

Obviously you can't change someone's sexuality by MSM pressure and whatnot so I think the idea of homosexual promotion being pushed and used in some way to break down society is complete and utter nonesense, but.....

I do think it might be possible for continued exposure (I can't think of a better way of putting it) to have some sort of effect, and more so to do with labels as I say rather than it being "evil" to be gay, or causing societal breakdown or however it was put. For instance, I know a couple of bisexual women who have both said to me that they're quite happy getting off with a woman and having a bit of one night fun or "fuckbuddy" type stuff but they could never be in a serious relationship/marry another woman. I'd have to ask whether the continued promotion of homosexuality as something to be celebrated would have any bearing on their attitudes in the long run. I think it might, it will probably lead to various sub-categories of bisexuality and divide us further. Case in point would be the lipstick lesbians.

I personally don't think that homosexuality should be celebrated and that's only because I also believe heterosexuality or bisexuality should not be celebrated also. It is what it is, no need to make a fuss.

In summary, I don't think there's an agenda to push homosexuality as such as its a futile effort, you're either gay or you're not. But, I do think the label mentality is being pushed and "I'm gay" is just another string on the bow of labels. Mass unidentification (I don't know if that's a word or not ) is the aim of the game and whatever form they can conceive it taking, it will surely take.

Atlantean2014 wrote:

You’ve Received a Campaign Update!


Hello xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Here’s an update for you from the ‘The People's Voice’ team:

1 new Announcement:

Here are some of presenter Richie Allen's best bits! Enjoy! And please share this page to show others what they are missing! Thanks!


www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-people-s-voice?c=activity

Watch on Indiegogo

Visit the ‘The People's Voice’ campaign.

Comment on or view this announcement here.

Respond directly to the campaign owner here.

Help spread the word about the campaign!



Note: To stop receiving updates from The People's Voice, click here.

You can also unsubscribe from all recurring Indiegogo emails in your account settings.

Sincerely,
The Indiegogo Team

Just had an email update from TPV. Seems they can't get anything right.

The email says:

The link takes you to the very first video of the very first Indiegogo campaign.

Lol Babs - seems we got this at the same time

Quality Street wrote:
Yeah you beat me to it, I was sitting here wondering how they got to £300,000 in a few hours lol!!!

Lunar Sea wrote:

Hey chand,

I didn't get that last picture, who is he?