irrepressible wrote:
I actually haven't got a clue about the old days tbh

but my point is, it's like Big Pharma was planned centuries ago. That's for another thread though
It's like this whole modern civilisation was drawn up thousands of years ago.
"Let's stitch the fuckers up with drugs!" Yeah! we'll give 'em diseases and shit!" Yeah!, let's destroy the old knowledge!" "
Yeah! we'll have them as babies, we'll be their parent!" "We'll force them into our city prisons! They'll think they're free!" Etc etc.

I think it's really hard to do this entire subject justice in a post on a forum, but most of what you're describing here, very notably the bolded part, is in Brave New World. Huxley also stated that a key element of an efficient fascist society is the...
www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/huxley_ult...evolution_032062.htm
process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. This is the, it seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolutions shall we say, and this is a problem which has interested me many years and about which I wrote thirty years ago, a fable, Brave New World, which is an account of society making use of all the devices available and some of the devices which I imagined to be possible making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged in some sort of scientific caste system. Since then, I have continued to be extremely interested in this problem and I have noticed with increasing dismay a number of the predictions which were purely fantastic when I made them thirty years ago have come true or seem in process of coming true.
A number of techniques about which I talked seem to be here already. And there seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution, a method of control by which a people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy. This, the enjoyment of servitude...
...if you can get people to consent to the state of affairs in which they're living. The state of servitude the state of being, having their differences ironed out, and being made amenable to mass production methods on the social level, if you can do this, then you have, you are likely, to have a much more stable and lasting society. Much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs and firing squads and concentration camps.
I don't think this is quite done by solely pharmacological means yet, as Huxley suggested, but although I prefer 1984 as a novel, it's pretty much accepted that Brave New World was closer in terms of its resemblance to contemporary society, particularly in the sense that it's seen quite clearly in the novel that people do love their servitude, they do love being part of their social class, they don't even mix with the other social classes, they don't question authority at all, and they associate their standard of living with the things that are put there to enslave them. Which is a pretty good analogy / microcosm of the society we live in.
I don't want to crap on about this for hours(!), but you can go back and look at an oft-quoted statement by a US investment banker for Lehman Brothers in the 1930s, Paul Mazer. "We must shift America from a needs to a desires culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed. Man's desires must overshadow his needs". And that's what you see today, there's a breakdown of the basic social bonds that had structured society previously for centuries, and instead, increasingly, people are driven by the basic desire to consume, to have more shiny things. And they don't even recognise this themselves because it's their desires that are in control of their behaviour and mindset, not their rational mind or any objective assessment of what would actually be good for them emotionally. And all of their peers behave this way too, so the basic social example of any form of cohesive, supportive communities just disappears completely, and eventually people can't imagine any other way of living. I'm sure if you mixed with Aboriginal Australians, or, say, some tribe in a Tibetan hill village, you would see a fundamentally different type of society, and, actually, a much happier one. Hence why you get endless Western people going to these sorts of places, and then saying things like "they don't own anything, but they were so content"!!!
So this is why people don't notice that Liverpool is a shithole!