In my case, blue you're making the dexision for me.
It's a poor show i'm afraid old fruit. A poor show.

He is temporarily suspended for whatever length of time. I don't want to see this place poisoned

Good.

He just did two weeks so wasn't the precedent, double for the next? That'd be a month.

thoreau wrote: I have to say, I do agree. Because the Daily Mail is guilty of printing pure poison, people often assume that they don't print any good articles, which is not true. I would say after The Guardian they print the second largest number of useful articles in the British media. They just balance it out with some of the worst journalism in the world ever (well, outside of the US). I definitely see the BBC as being far, far more damaging than the Mail because they are trusted, yet they systematically lie and mislead people on a massive scale.

batou wrote: Thank fuck for that.

I'm sure he'll come back with an entirely new and mature attitude...

wake_up_bomb wrote:
I see bias in everything in all honesty - even my own musings contain my own bias - the way I see it with the msm is that there is usually a tiny germ of 'truth' and the rest is hyperbole to appeal to their readership - which ever readership that is - could be the mail, could be the guardian, could be presstv or any media - the key is in finding that tiny nugget of truthy goodness and then finding as many primary sources from as many viewpoints as possible - which is where the headlines and subsequent room for deeper discussion come in.