I see that even wub can't see what is spelled out in front of him.
Even though i have stated it clearly more than once.
It's little wonder then that he and the rest of you save 3.5 can't see that you have all just taken a big dump on the principles of fair play.

dubmeup wrote:
He's been given a 1 week suspension. Please drop the issue.

dubmeup wrote:
Oh I can see, thank you.
Is Blue_Tackler a sock of yours by any chance and are just taking the piss or what? Honestly, to me it looks that way.

marina wrote:
I was begining to think that myself.

Dub, I've sent you a PM, I'm not going to discuss this any further.

No. Blue Tackler isn't Dubs.

sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...html?start=60#200638

Yes. I too can read and i have seen that oi has thwarted you lot's gung ho do what the fuck we want attitude by overturning your shitty ban and commuting it to a weeks suspension.

And you can all shove your pathetic ad hominems and ooo is bt a dub sock shit up your sanctimonious cliquey pompous arses.

And no. I will not be apologising for ripping into you and assaulting you in such a way.

Ta to oi.

Gilly wrote:
Strange how he always seems to go to the bathroom whenever BT arrives, a la Clark Kent

I'm just kidding, trying to lighten the mood.

Lets draw a line though, before there are hurt feelings.

All the best Dubs.

Have any of you ever seen me and Superman in the same room?

Just saying....

...and I am

And I a Napoleon Boneparte. Pleased to meet you.

oioioi wrote:

You fooled them all oioioi , we all thought you were Batman....

@dubs this is exactly what a certain banned member who shall remain nameless was on about

@ Thoreau - have you looked at that certain unnamed member is really like? Seen him on other forums? I highly doubt it.

Can we name the member? I'm confused

thoreau wrote:
What is?

I'm also more inclined towards Dubs pov. BT should be free to be critical but he's not very tactful & it's obviously totally ungrateful being so disparaging to somebody who has been making a lot of effort for the community. We can't just start banning people for that though. He does post some constructive stuff but tends to get on people's nerves, and they seem to get on his. It's a bit like being sat in the pub chatting away and someone else turns up who you have a bit of a chat with then he starts being a bit of a pissed up pest and knocking your pint over. The landlord is onto it & he'll end up getting booted out if he carries on. But what he's done so far doesn't warrant launching. The pissed up pest should really stay away from the pub but he loves it too much.

@ Silva...

No

He might interpret it as a summons.

He currently skulks in the sewers filled with depravity, that make your flesh crawl just thinking about them. I watch sometimes, briefly. In part, to satisfy myself that my instinctive (though not infallible) mistrust was well justified. There are some intelligent and well-grounded people who give credit where they don't realise it isn't due, imo.



@ SB...If the pissed up pest doesn't want hoofing out, he should at the very least refrain from calling everybody who posts on a particular thread insulting names, and calling everyone who uses forums idiotic etc. It's done to bait - he's successfully baited, and now he's reaping the rewards of that success.