Evie wrote:

Absolutely marina!

@dubmeup No.
@Evie Ditto, I guess

Goldenprince13 wrote:
Jesus wept!

3point5 wrote:
Yes i use that term on here from time to time, now are you going to answer or not....

Let's drop it hey. I don't think there's much to be gained from going this route.

Goldenprince13 wrote: 3point5 wrote: batou wrote:
I think that's probably best. Consider this my last post about it If you have any more questions GP, feel free to PM me or start a new thread about it. Or, read back through this thread as they've probably already been answered.

They have not been answered but i will pm you then this thread can be locked as it should be.

marina wrote: so you are unwilling/unable to provide evidence oftroll defending?

I can't be fucked with this anymore tbh.
No doubt 'Mary fucking Poppins' will be along in a minute as well to back dubs up and tell us what very naughty children we've all been.

Consensus is evidently only reached when it aligns absolutely with their view.
Kerrist it's old!.

feather wrote:
Actually...not a bad idea...we could all do with sweetening up every now and again...and stop taking life so seriously......recognise within ourselves whether we want to fall out with folks on here...or have a forum where we can have Sanctum.......if it's the former and you're prepared to 'take on all comers' who disagree with you, and not prepared to forgive, forget, move on, then this forum should get a name change.

angelchemuel wrote: If there’s a task that must be done,
Don’t turn your tail and run.
Don’t pout. Don’t sob.
Just do a half-arsed job.

If you cut every corner it is really not so bad.
Everybody does it – even mom and dad.
If nobody sees it...then nobody gets mad.
It’s the American way.

Back me up on what feqther?

I was only drawing atterntion, again, to the fact that no-one is defending trolls...

marina wrote:

As you have brought up my condition, I shall respond to it.




If you read this medium.com/p/cd8e71619485 you might actually learn something, if this was the kind of article that you covered in SZ news, you'd be doing something useful.




It contends some of the 'journalism' in the MSM, you know them, the MSM right? The source of quite a few of the news stories that you post on the SZ front page.

What can be assumed to be part of the SZ ethos as stated in the 'Welcome message' is contradicted by these news stories as per there sources, there are many other MSM stories also being used as sources for SZnews, the SZnews is, when cross referenced with the SZ welcome message ethos, indeed 'fucking lame' thus I have not been 'trolling' when using such a description ('fucking lame') when referring to the news stories displayed.

I'm now waiting to see what type of illusion is going to be projected via cognitive dissonance to deal with this contradiction.

I would also in light of this information like to have my 'suspension' overturned (which was in fact 2 weeks?), I know I can't get the time back, quite obviously, what I'm appealing for is clarification from the facilitators that I had not been 'trolling' when I said that 'marina's news stories are fucking lame' therefore if I do receive a warranted suspension in the future it is started again at 1 week.


Thus this suspension to be scrubbed off my record

No, your suspension should not be scrubbed at all. No matter how much you whine and talk endlessly about your condition, etc etc etc, you were deliberately & completely unnecessarily obnoxious to another member, just for the hell of it.

I don't understand why the majority vote for you to be banned wasn't upheld.

But here you are, predictably picking up where you left off instead of making any attempt to start afresh. *Yawn*.

It wasn't upheld because it was bs, gilly. Oi stepped in and took appropriate action.

Still, there will likely be another vote in the near future. Hopefully that one will be better set up...

It may have been BS in your opinion, Dubs, but probably not in the opinion of others, otherwise why did they vote? Sorry, but I've never spotted any agreement decreeing that the majority vote is over-ruled if Oi decides it's BS. That's BS imo.

marina wrote:
''All of the above will be tied to the relevant NLP techniques and methodologies like: rapport building, Meta model, Milton model, hypnosis, goal setting, time lines, belief change, swish technique, chunking, reframing, working with metaphors and strategies. Each step of the Magickal Process is completely explained in NLP terms. So even while the whole course is about magick, you still use NLP in each and every step. And more, you learn a lot about NLP too!''
nlpmagick.net/

2. Lesser Magic
“Non-ritual or manipulative magic, sometimes called "LESSER MAGIC", consists of the wile and guile obtained through various devices and contrived situations, which when utilized, can create 'change, in accordance with one's will'.”

"The Satanic Bible"
Anton LaVey (1969)
Book of Belial: 1

Subtle body language & subconscious communication (i.e., reading 'in between the lines' when a person speaks) are forms of Lesser Magic. Day to day behaviour or specific roles you slip into are forms of lesser magic... the art of controlling people in the most subtle ways. In that much, it isn't a form of supernatural magic, but everyday psychology, even if some develop an uncommon capability in it.
www.dpjs.co.uk/lesser.html
.