Goldenprince13 wrote:
Okay firstly, i am in total agreement that it would be idiotic to accuse someone based on one post, that is why i do not do it, i look at things far more than that in my own way
Then I fail to see how I am a wolf in sheeps clothing. I've made it clear plenty of times that I'm skeptical of most conspiracies. I am here because you're a good bunch of people, and whilst I may not believe many conspiracies I'm still very interested in them. That's why you'll not see me posting in most threads on here unless it's a 'general chat' type thread.
Goldenprince13 wrote:
And secondly the gifs were posted for 1] to make light and be symbolic of a funny distraction
And there you have why I posted it. I felt it fitting to the thread and how I perceived a number of the replies.
Goldenprince13 wrote:
Thirdly, If you are so full of courage as you claim, then why did you not answer the question about the "window licker" gif that i posted and instead chose to use the fact i posted gifs as a diversion....hardly courageous when you have to duck a question in such a way,
I already explained what I meant by it and you have replied above.
3point5 wrote:
I think you're idiotic for accusing someone of being a 'sheep in wolfs clothing' for having a differing opinion.
Gilly wrote:
Now lookie here!
(I just said that to aggravate

)
The way I see it, although it's community driven, that doesn't mean, surely, that the facilitators are impotent to act on their own initiative when they see someone being a tit?
100%. It's the mods decision at the end of the day, and what you guys decide is the final say whether we all agree or not. Us whingers just like, well, whinging!
I tried replying to your PM by the way but am still having issues sending them

Thanks for the link and I can see what you mean!