mikey mikey wrote:
Could be... was just throwing my random thought in there I have so many of them, I gotta put them to some use lol.

StarsChildren wrote:


tbh in my opinion it doesn't prove anything either way

neither did the original story either

still, sold a few newspapers

mikey mikey wrote:
There should be a law against newspapers printing bollocks.

Oh, wait.......

silvershine wrote:
RT is a newspaper?
oh I see, you are talking about Harry's testicles in that rag of yours

mikey mikey wrote: There should be a law against newspapers printing bollocks and websites printing bollocks and listening in to peoples phone calls and printing it. .

silvershine wrote:
We can't eve get guidleines about malicious cunts on SZ, so no chance.

mikey mikey wrote:
Who is malicious?
Not me. I speak truth. Funnily enough I was talking to the police yesterday, they mentioned your name. (honest).

silvershine wrote:

silvershine........you do not work in a newspaper you are not Rebacca Brooks

Stop being so stoooooooooooopid

silvershine wrote:
I don't believe I mentioned your name.
silvershine wrote:
Malicious doesn't mean liar. Your conscience is betraying you.

Speaking of liars, I wonder if you will deny your membership of SZ on the TZ.
silvershine wrote:
Tell Sting I said hi.

dawnbreak wrote:
Prove it

I would love to know more about jesus life from a historical view (rather then biblical) he sounds like a cool guy - not that different in many ways to many posters here - he saw something wrong with the system and wanted to change it - He may or may not had a wife and/or kids - neither or which would change his message - though it does leave a big mark hanging over the heads of those who put together the bible and chose to leave that particular piece of info out....

silvershine wrote:

I quite like Jesus .....and have always thought he did have a wife/ girlfriend

i am biased though ..............I have past life flashbacks where I think I'm Mary Magodolene

mikey mikey wrote: The only one doing jail time out of you and me, will be you matey.
I haven't caused a split.
See you in court.

silvershine wrote:
Not a fan of poetry then?

mikey mikey wrote: Poetry serves it's purpose, doesn't it? Mr set up.

my great great grandad was a poet........he was known as the railway poet (coz he worked on the railways and wrote poems


This one of his


THE BAIRNIES cuddle doon at nicht
Wi’ muckle faught an’ din;
“Oh try and sleep, ye waukrife rogues,
Your faither’s comin’ in.”
They never heed a word I speak; 5
I try to gie a froon,
But aye I hap them up an’ cry,
“Oh, bairnies, cuddle doon.”

Wee Jamie wi’ the curly heid—
He aye sleeps next the wa’— 10
Bangs up an’ cries, “I want a piece;”
The rascal starts them a’.
I rin an’ fetch them pieces, drinks,
They stop awee the soun’,
Then draw the blankets up an’ cry, 15
“Noo, weanies, cuddle doon.”

But, ere five minutes gang, wee Rab
Cries out, frae ’neath the claes,
“Mither, mak’ Tam gie ower at ance,
He ’s kittlin’ wi’ his taes.” 20
The mischief’s in that Tam for tricks,
He ’d bother half the toon;
But aye I hap them up and cry,
“Oh, bairnies, cuddle doon.”

dawnbreak wrote:
I just read that to my mum (a Scot) and she LOVED it.

I'll be reading that at our next session of music and poetry very soon.

Dawn is awarded best poetry reading of 2012