dawnbreak wrote:
I am not arguing Dawn. I am being told to fuck off.

I have made no insults in return.

dawnbreak wrote:
Jimmy Seville will burn in hell for all eternity

mikey mikey wrote:

MrsGood wrote:
Thankyou...LMFAO

Gilly you don't want to acknowledge the fact that Jimmy Saville was protected by masons because your married to a mason

Well there not

if you genuinely think that all masons are good you are not the person I thought you were

Black Cloud wrote:

I take it my PM olive branch yesterday was not accepted.

You two can start a new thread about me in Vent, now.

In the meantime, I will wait ofr the other Black Cloud to come back.

I get on really well with him. He should move out and get his own account.

I'm a Mason, I ain't evil , or into bothering little kids, or even into a conspiracy so grand, you'll wet your strides..

If you want , I'll get you in, you will eat all the icecream you want, and know one will tell you when to go to bed

dawnbreak wrote:
She quite clearly said that she did NOT think all Masons were good.

That is quite different from thinking that Masonry is a cover for instituionalised paedophelia.

mikey mikey wrote:
The entire power system itself is the cover.
Money, business, government, all of it.
Its the height of ignorance to suggest that one particular group or institution is more important than others.

True but most pedophiles are protected by masons..

This does not mean all masons are pedophiles but are an institution to cover 'it up'

dawnbreak wrote:
Or by thr Catholic Church, or by the Royal Family, or by Common Purpose, or by Social Services, or by the Music and Film business, or by The Jews (yes that accusation is welll known and I know you know that people have tried to tie Savile to Israel/Jews).

And so it goes

I do not particullarly agree with Free Masonry nor would I join them (but apparently my great grandfather was one). However, I can see when they are being scapegoated.

As Andyh quite rightly points out, where there is any power in an institution, especially one that has contact with children, nonces will attempt to infiltrate.

MrsGood wrote:
Then you know the points I've made are correct and fair.

And my neck's fully wound in, y' cheeky bint! You'll know when it's not!

mikey mikey wrote:
wtf? Seriously?
How?

On a forum not very different from this one.

dawnbreak wrote:
Sorry, Dawn, I missed this query earlier.

Wives only go to social the functions. It's not something I'd want to join, personally. There is a women's masons, but I've never looked into it, through lack of interest.

dawnbreak wrote:
Well they're not what?
dawnbreak wrote:
And if you genuinely think that's what I said, I reckon you should go back and read what I've actually written, Dawn.

dawnbreak wrote:
Says who? Where are you getting this info from?

Life Gilly , life ...It's no secret t that Jimmy Saville was a high ranking mason

dawnbreak wrote:
Or a BBC presenter, or a Knight and friend of the royals, or a Roman Catholic, or a influential figure in the pop business, or a night club owner, or an NHS porter, or a "benefactor" of various childern's homes, or a visitor-come-warden of Broadmoor, or a close friend of Maggie Thatcher, or an honorary green beret of the Marines, or a Knight of Malta or a friend of Israel, allegedly.

So why single out Freemasonry?

Or are the Masons just first in a line of fire?

why single out Freemasonry.............err because they have form to be not 'that nice'