That's really weird, Gilly. I can actually hear it clearer in the first video right at 5:08 and it sounds like the same voice heard a second before, but the radio clicks off and on again and his tone changes into drone mode making it sound like a command. WTF was that? I did not hear it on first listen, but on second listen it is loud and clear.

At the beginning of the tape is the "two shadows" comment which I heard reported in early developments.

Something else that bewilders me is the newscast showing police in the trunk of the car releasing magazines from the weapon. First of all, you DO NOT do that in an investigation. Secondly, the reporters didn't blink an eye, one of them said something like "as you can see, police are hard at work, there is much to uncover".

Are you ladies both married?
What does your husband think of benny hill?

Benny Hill Does he live in Sandy Hook?


You sure are interested in whether people are married or not. Why is that?

This first clip is just the "End the life of Adam" phrase:

www.mediafire.com/download.php?36vt1krntd61oe5


This second clip is that same piece of audio reversed:

www.mediafire.com/download.php?t0y4qqc4zccbzu7


And this one is reversed and slowed down:

www.mediafire.com/download.php?nnuv1p9ftzq25zs


Merry Fucking Christmas, y'all!!

@ Gue - yet another impressive display of your unique & profound "...rigorous analysis, which I would say I am pretty alone in conducting in this particular forum?" That's the spirit, lad.

@ Phem - my machine won't let me download them.

So what do your husbands think of your theory?

Mine neither phem. I got a pop up page saying my computer was loaded with viruses instructing me to push button to start clean up.

Maybe, if you could, put what was heard backwards in spoilers so anyone not interested does not have to see and anyone who wants to hear for themselves first cannot be spoiled?

End the Life of Adam

Mada fo efil eht dne. does it sound latin?

Gilly wrote:
"It's too late for that" But is he talking about common sense in this thread

"End the Life of Adam" just gave me some thoughts and my tinfoil hat is on now. I have thrown out some random ideas in this thread including the mention of Georgia Guidestones and their message to mankind. Everything is coming together and I'll write it up in a new post and put it under spoiler tags so if anyone following this thread is annoyed by conspiracy speculation you have been duly warned and you shouldn't read it, especially on this first day of a new era because it will only contribute to your irritation.


Eh... on second thought why bother.


The names Sandy do figure into it, too.

Guevarista wrote:
Why do you wish to know?

What theory are you talking about?

I haven't proposed one - simply looked at bits of information which don't fit with the official story.

Instead of trolling, counter each of those with your superior intellect. I'm not rooting for things to be a certain way - just trying to determine what actually happened. What are you trying to do? (As if the answer to that wasn't blatantly obvious).

Unless you do as requested, I'll be ignoring any further input from your trollish self.

@ Non-trolls - as hinted at earlier, I'm hoping someone with a bit of technical savy could give some indication of whether the police scan clip is likely to have been edited to add that sinister comment. There are plenty of tit-headed trolls who take malicious delight in misdirecting.

saying "it's too late for that" is not sinister, that's what the Police officer said in that clip, "its to late for that", where you got "end the life of adam from I don't know" , perhaps one of your husbands is called Adam? or did that idea that that's what's being said originate from someone else?

BTW the fact you're being defensive about what your husband thinks about your theory is interesting to me, it makes me wanna know more what he says when you tell him that the Sandy Hook massacre was just a big stitch up/dramatization etc. .

Gilly why do you discount all common sense and logic to deny the official story>?

p.p.s what i'm trying to do is to save your marriage!

Guevarista wrote:
Quoted before you edit again

Guevarista wrote:
Thank you. Now that you've said that & I've played it back a couple of times, you might be right. Not 100% sure. But that kind of observation is helpful.
Guevarista wrote:
I take it you didn't read the title of the Youtube clip?
Guevarista wrote:
Not liking this obsessive probing about our husbands.
Guevarista wrote:
Erm - the title of the Youtube clip.
Guevarista wrote:
1). You really need to stop fantasising about my husband.

2). I have not presented any theory about the whole event, as already pointed out, troll-boy.

3). I actually don't think the 'whole thing' was a dramatization, as you'd know if you'd bothered to read the thread - or maybe you do know but you're just practiing your pig-ignorant baiting techniques. Either way, your typically abrasive approach does you no credit.
Guevarista wrote:
Guevarista, why don't you explain all the anomolies? Go on - one by one.

*Edit* Just noted your edit. Have you actually got your dick in your hand while you're typing?

noseymutegirl wrote:
Go on ahead, Nosey! I'd love to see what you have sketched out. If other people reading this thread don't like it they can easily keep on scrollin'.

Gilly wrote:
I'm no professional audio engineer, Gilly, but it is extremely possible for audio like that to be faked. Someone could have slipped it in and without detailed, in-depth scrutiny (and some moderately high-end gear) it'd be near impossible to tell that that's been done. Except of course for someone with the right equipment and know-how skills. Just giving it a casual few listen-throughs I couldn't hear any fakery but like I said, I'm no pro. With audio quality that poor it'd be hard to tell not to mention slightly challenging to replicate fake audio snips to match in a "sneak-in". I'm sure there are ears upon it as we type here, checking for its legitimacy.

to understand the anomalies i'd have to understand what parts of information were relevent to you, what stood out and why, and for this i'd need to know a bit about you, your sexual appetites and so on, coz it's psychological innit, so you should post a paragraph or two about your fantasies, do you like danger gilly?

Guevarista wrote:
You're such a little liar - you're making all these posts, and you haven't bothered your lazy arse to read the thread, have you! Just like your post the other night, when you admitted you'd not read the thread, before making your condescending remarks! So you don't even know what the anomolies are that have been discussed.

'Kin pitiful!

End of giving you any responses to your bait.

every "anomaly" that's been brought up to me has proven to be crazy, why would i keep looking at more? makes dumb but if you keep bringing u[ all these different "anomalies" for some reason, like a cop speaking on a walkie talky i'll offer you my grand illuminated oversight mmkay

Sorry guys, about y'all not being able to scoop up the files. Let me try to figure something out, maybe slap 'em up on YouTube. I can't post and share "Private" videos, but they'll show up and be watchable if they're just "Unlisted" right??

I'll try that maybe. Give me a little bit here....

*Sigh* I do hope nobody falls into the trap of pointing out which of the many anomalies have not been answered convincingly (or at all), and thus saving him the trouble of reading the information.