.......... wrote:
novum wrote:
.......... wrote:
People on the DIF forum think everything is fake including the victims...smh
They also think all 3000 9/11 victims were all fake....
I know 2 people who died on 9/11 one in the towers and the other in the Pentagon was my friend.
Makes me just wan't to give up on conspiracy theories like this.
Yes there can be dis info out there. But you are making a huge sweeping generalisation about all posters on the DIF, which to me is at the least highly ambitious of you. There is a wide variety of opinions there on these subjects.
there are always multiple possibilites for any scenario...i dont need to go quoting socrates now but my homeboy knew the deal in his quotes about what we know and dont know.
now..how about one possible scenario...all victims
are real, but the event was carried out for reasons other than what we are told...i dont give a fuck about what any of the reuters and assoc press apologists say here or anywhere else. What i just said..well to me ts plausible.
Thing is novum that i'm not sure if the idea of everything being faked is necessarily dis info.
I'm actually starting to think some people really believe these events are totally fake and nobody died.
At least in the case of 9/11 i could never believe that because i know 2 people that died.
When i said that on DIF i got multiple responses calling me a Shill ect...
Which i find very strange since i do think 9/11 is probably a conspiracy from multiple aspects.
But for people in other countries to say it was all smoke and mirrors and nobody died is outrageous.
I assume it all comes from people watching a movie called september clues because someone said this.
"
Might I suggest you contact www.septemberclues.info/ as they are looking for validation of survivors."
It's just the fact people in other countries think nobody died is leaving me even more sceptical about CT.
An event need not be totally faked for it to have its intended purpose.
On 9/11 planes did hit buildings and 3000 or so people did indeed die, however, the official description of what happened literally breaks the laws of physics, you know...things like buildings falling into their own footprint at near freefall speed, 3 times on the same day and one of the buildings not even hit by a plane, then there's these awkward pesky terrorists whose passports survive it all (lol) who then turn up later alive and well and wondering wtf they're on TV!
But thats all just 'conspiracy theory' and to be totally ignored.
What I would question in this case is who exactly the shooter really was....what was the actual murder weapon used.
(still yet to be addressed or investigated in any way whatsoever...)
Then there is the motive but we ignore that because the guy was ' a retard' or something.
I would put it to anyone that news both can and indeed has been staged many times.
The proof of this is overwhelming and tbh I'm surprised anyone here hasn't seen it given that afaik everyone here's been on DIF for ages too!?
Eg David de Rothschild.
www.whale.to/c/tony_greenberg.html
Tony Greenberg....aka David Rothschild....aka Bin Ladens son! lol....
Check out the hairline, the nose, the eyebrows, the lips.
Guevarista wrote:
.jpg)
