feather wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
Every incompetent mistake or each time the con is exposed, it gets all 'cold war' the spies are out to get us!.
Ffs it's simply an identification of their own scams/faults, the identifiers are not 'spies' they are usually people who have been somehow dealt a distasteful, spiteful and negative sample of poorly judged NLP from the Icke con gang.
From every aspect, Initial business plan, budgeting, personnel, accounting, presentation, crisis anticipation and contingency management, public relations, tech standards, honoring donation tied commitments, on and on and on
every fuck up is someone else's fault.
TPV is a slo-mo collapse because the folks involved are delusional, shallow, media luvvies, who have more ambition and undue self-esteem than professionalism or clues on what is really required to pull something like this off.
Some kids with a half-decent webcam and a youtube channel could sit the TPV outfit's arses down and give them a masterclass.
FOR FREE!
Already happening and has been for some years!
Why didn't they follow that model in increments to make it a success?
What I don't understand is they have gone for an internet TV station, yet they have set it up as a full broadcast outfit; if they raised 500,000 and are going for more, why didn't they use that money to get them a slot on a satellite channel like RT?
Here is the model for success;
Icke already has an established web presence, given www credibility thanks to the good work of posters at HIS forum. It is a simple click to link to Icke's YT channel. He already has all the basics for starting his own channel... GET THE CONTENT UP FIRST and then grow the operation as the content increases and the volunteers and contributers are drawn in.
So, post regular videos, one a week, or one a day, and start putting a cry out for people to add content, get some guests on; all the time having appeals for funding, yeah do a telethon; with that funding slowly rack things up as can be afforded; then purchase some live-video streaming server space and start doing a weekly webcast - if that is successful, make it daily. Get the volunteers in, get PEOPLE to provide content and start padding out the time slots, before you know it someone like Icke would be attracting contributers and volunteers and have more video minutes than there are hours in the day. Start giving talented people their own slots, get them producing their own segments. £50 for a new video camera from eBay is adequate if you are beaming it across a stream, the message doesn't have to be in HD from the off! Get these PEOPLE to go out and make their own videos; A studio can be set up in Ickes own home, or rent somewhere cheap OUTSIDE LONDON. £16 for a webcam, hang a sheet up, get a couple of 50w lamps, and you have a studio and are ready to cook up your own internet TV channel.
It does not need a sprawling office, a production and management team and broadcast quality cameras and studios from the off, you build up to that!
But instead we get this pantomime! Why the enormous set up for what is essentially an internet stream?
Really looking like it was a planned failure.
Peter Tatchell, Edwina Currie, Russel Brand... need we say more?