oioioi wrote:
If I have a screenshot of that post it means you're bang to rights confessing all - correct?

I dont think this thread should be locked but I do think that on occasion its the best thing to do.... as it was the other night on the 'pisspipes' thread.

You guys need to hand over the reigns asap or you're gonna lose half your membership imo, give me a trial period of 3 weeks moderation, I think I'm among the least popular here so most likely to be unbiased.

Mike wrote:
And you're basing that on what exactly?

i-baster wrote:
Do you really, really want me to answer your question?
It's not just war or economy and not having any power to change either of them. The discussion would be about how these as two examples would truly impact on our personal lives, and what we can do to lessen that impact. As many people here have pointed out, Dogsmilk and WuB can chose not to engage each others posts. I'm sorry if it sounds 'holier than thou' but that seems like a very adult resolution and quite simple.
They both have valid points which have been made.
It's rather like "while the Bosteon bombing was happening and peoples attention was diverted, the US Gov passed CISPA"........which will affect us as it will shut down the internet. That would put paid to this forum.

I'm emotionally exhausted for personal reasons, so please forgive me if my post appears to be a bit of a so I bid you good night.


Jane

Mike wrote:
"If you want to know the taste of a pear, you must change the pear by eating it yourself."

Mao Zedong

Drama queens and shit stirrers , do us all a favour and have a nice hot cup of stfu

My question was rhetorical. If you think other topics more worthy then post in those. If everybody stops posting the topic dies. If you lock a topic it starts a fire sometimes.

sorry for random video Lightgiver is my father

dawnbreak wrote: This is also a fair comment.
As an aside, I joined this place at I perceived it to be the forum that the more learned members of the Icke forum that had left on mass some time ago had created for less argumentative discussion. As it turns out, a lot of you spend 90% of the time arguing with each other..
Oh well..

vizier wrote:
... 'mon en

vizier wrote: I generally argue to substantiate some of the slogans, reified concepts and platitudes in the CT genre, argument is not just inane waffle, most of that occurs in threads devoid of argumentation, devoid of anything worth arguing about, when people know stuff or feel they know stuff and speak their mind, they inevitably meet resistance... You think Icke got where he is today by running from arguments? (in the beginning he didn't but we know he's been doing it for the last 10 years).

WUBS says some intelligent things but then gets huffy if someone asks him about his sources

AndyH does too but into the venus programme and hates money and bankers

Dogsmilk sort of agrees with both of them but hates to admit it

Psketti watches snooker and that skanky Ronnie

Oi worries about whether any of responses make him less of an anarchist

batou sits back and laughs

dawnbreak wrote:

Bite me biatch

oh come on you have to admit he hasn't seen the working end of a shower in months

dawnbreak wrote:
I hate what money has become specifically dawn, not what it used to be prior to the 20th century

dawnbreak wrote:
He's been working on a pig farm actually

That aside, he looks as perfect as he usually does sprawled naked across the table during matches

dawnbreak wrote:
Oi the facilitator/moderator?

oioioi wrote: