www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26089486

I think this subject is fascinating.

I have tried to have a conversation about this subject on other forums - it doesn't usually go well as you always get some nut going OT with biblebashing or whatever. Not so fascinating in that case!

I am of the view that there has been a rise in the number of homosexual young people recently (ie. last few years as opposed to last few decades).
I appreciate this is just my opinion, the stats on this are not yet out & put onto a nice graph for us

I know most think it's solely a genes thing. I always thought this too until recently, but the article (yes, sorry, BBC ) sugests other possibilities.

My rather uninformed opinion now - call it a hunch - is the increase in contraceptives, other medicines, and hormones in food are one fo the causes of the increase in the homesexual population.

Or it could just be that exactly the same % are gay now, just that they're more comfortable in coming out thanks to gender neutral parenting

The latter I would say.
Not only that but we'd never even report on it or have media to mention the topic in the past.
As for Darwin you may aswell ask why people support war amongst a zillion other far more destructive tendencies than merely not having offspring.

It is just as likely that the apparent increase in the percentage of gay members of society is that people are more likely to identify as being gay now that it's no longer illegal.

Actually, watch the percentage of declared homosexuals in Uganda drop dramatically in the very near future.
Must be something in the water.
Or perhaps ignorant, medieval minded, fucks in their legislator.

We'll ask abs. He'll know them all

psketti wrote:
Even the one's that don't know themselves?

oioioi wrote:



He never leaves home without one of these I heard

I personally think it is social engineering and the do what thou wilt mentality borne from it....also noted the stories coming out about people having sex with animals....all part of the same engineering imho

The acceptance and moral barrier is being dragged down relentlessly, and while you have a me,me, me society being engineered, then morality goes out the window more and more....there is a lot to be said for staying as pure in mind and body as you can at this time...again imo

Gay animals.

That is all.

I kind of agree with ALL of the above

The fact that homosexuality (& gay animals) has been around since the dawn of the time surely proves there must be some kind of hereditary involvement - but what if that involvement was only like a disposition? That seems to be the way science is leading us with this.

So, if you had half the population as 'carriers', & the reproductive organs of the parents, or the unborn babies (themselves in the womb) orientation could be influenced, or even determined by, for example a surge of hormone... where does that leave us?

I honestly think of the young people/children now there are more that appear to be far less stereotypically male (it is mostly the boys) than when I was at school & certainly my parents/grandparents times.
Maybe that doesn't mean they will grow up to be homosexual though, I do realise that

I'm just very interested in the changing way in which people live - the huge mix of men's change of place in society, different family structures, working patterns of parents, and of course media & general openess in society - & also 'pretend liberalism', as seen in the gender neutral parenting thread.

& I'm interested in how the changes we make today out of convenience & "forward thinking" effect us later on.
The contraceptive pill & other hormonal treatments have been widely used now for, what, 50 years? Have they had any unexpected impact on our health? Is anyone checking? Would they tell us if there were found to be cons as well as the obvious pros?

Like the tobacco industry..... & I don't mean to do a Sheryl Crow, but was there any connection to CFC deodrants & a rise in lymph node & breast cancers?
& I know many are waiting to see - proper doom porn style - how mobiles & wireless everywhere may effect us later on.

....Sorry I'm proper rambling now .
It's like 2 years worth of thoughts pouring out 'cos on other forums the discussion has usually turned into a slanging match by the time I return on day 2

Goldenprince13 wrote:
I agree, and in my opinion it will be the normalisation of paedophilia next. People will soon be defending paedophiles with the same vehemence they defend homosexuals. They were just born that way too.

It always blows my mind how so many awakened non-sheep totally distrust the government and call them the tool of the corrupt elites, but totally go along with their gay agenda as if the government (corrupt, lying scumbags that they are) are totally right on this one. When Patricia Hewitt and the NCCL were trying to get the age of consent lowered to 10 it wasn't just for the benefit of heterosexual paedophiles.

Liberalism is about leaving people alone, not forcing something on someone.
Those parents trying to supposedly 'free' that child are doing anything but, as you say it is pretend liberalism. Worse if anything its forcing something unnatural on the kid.

Liberal!=left wing. Only in America

grackus wrote:

Homosexuality is normal and fuck all to do with paedophilia.

I'm gonna treat the attempt to link homosexuality with paedophilia to as much attention as it respects.

So moving on to this 'Gay Agenda'; this suggests tptb are somehow persuading people to be gay against their nature. This suggests you believe people's sexuality can be manipulated. Tell me then grackus, what would it take to make you gay?

psketti wrote:
Next it will be

Paedophilia is normal and fuck all to do with necrophilia.

It has to be done step by step.

grackus wrote:

This is your answer?

You're having a fucking laugh.

I knew you were a particular kind of cunt.

Sadly, I'm quite sickened to have been right.

Hey I intended this to be about the science / genetics / evolution

ETA: F'kinnell, there's always one

psketti wrote:
I will never think that homosexuality is normal. It's not like you explained your opinion that homosexuality is normal. You just asserted it. You seem to think it's ok for you to do this, but not for those that disagree with you. Fair enough.